The Dog in the Night-Time

(2006)

“It is of the highest importance in the art of detection to be able to recognise out of a number of facts which are incidental and which are vital... I would call your attention to the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.”“The dog did nothing in the night-time.”“That was the curious incident.” Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930), English author. Sherlock Holmes and Inspector Gregory, in The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes, “Silver Blaze” (1893).

White Racists always claim you cannot prove Whites – as such - racist. (They do this to conceal Their own racism, of course.) Just for fun, let Frank TALKER beguile you with some lateral thinking that, for most of you, will be old-hat. Let us see if those who think They are cleverer than the darker-skinned among us can provide logical refutations to what you are about to read. Like the recent birth of twins - one black; one white - the chances of this are at least a million-to-one (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770&in_a_source=&ct=5).

Firstly, nobody has to prove someone a racist – they only have to possess reasonable suspicion and act accordingly; which is to say, warily. If Whites do not like this then They might like to consider acting as ambassadors for Their own race if They truly wish Whites to be respected – as a whole. And we all know that Whites are famous for Their oxymoronic gunboat diplomacy. It is inherently unjust to judge a race by the behaviour of its minorities rather than by its majority. Thus, the following bullet-points are designed to prove the majority of whites racist and so deserving of being treated as such.

Secondly, anyone is perfectly entitled to act out of belief - especially when personal survival is at stake. (If this were not so, the religious among us would have no right to speak or act.) Whites, after all, claim that killing innocent civilians to protect the rest of us from terrorism is acceptable on exactly the same basis of belief – as opposed to reason and/or facts. Without accepting that belief is sometimes stronger than logic - in extremis - we condemn the entire policy of belief in the absence of concrete evidence to support our beliefs. Again, tThis would entirely invalidate religious belief, for example, which note, even non-atheists aren’t prepared to do.

As you judge people by what they do, you also judge them by what they do not do. So, let us look at what They (The White Race) do not do. Here is where Blacks get the problem of race-relations the wrong way about. They think that you judge a man solely by what he does. However, you also judge men by what they do not do, which they should be doing in light of what they actually do - and say they do. The fight for legal civil rights for Blacks only dealt with overt racism; now the race-war must focus on covert ethnocentrism.

The fact of the matter is that with issues regarding bad human behaviour – like racism – it’s important to recognise that such behaviour works best if one is unaware of it. The intended victim is lulled into a false sense of racial security; the racist’s poor behaviour never comes into sharp focus in his own mind because it’s institutional nature makes it appear normal and right. The only reason Whites try to hide Their racism is not because They recognise its immorality but because They don’t want to ruin Their career prospects if They’re caught being racist. (For a racist, racism is only wrong if he gets caught!) This leads to a focus not on eradicating racist behaviour but upon concealing it. This is why bad attitudes are best revealed by what is not done rather than by what is done, since what you’re looking for is the very thing they try to conceal; making it harder to find. And yet what they try to hide is always revealed by what they do not do since, if they weren’t bad people, they would be doing good, instead.

With all this firmly in mind, here are some juicy examples of activities Whites don’t engage in which They should given Their alleged commitment to challenging Their own inbred racist attitudes. Frank TALKER humbly offers them for your certain delectation:

Whites never come out and openly and freely admit that They need the help of Blacks in the so-called War on Terror. To make such an admission would be to admit White dependency on Blacks that would prove that Whites are not as superior as They would like to think of Themselves as being. Whites instead opt for the age-old, tired and trusted-and-true method of trying to persecute Blacks in the hope that this will frighten Them into not threatening White communities with high explosives. Of course, such racism only makes such terrorism more – not less – likely.

Given that there are so many Whites who claim that racism is such a bad thing, why are there none who have renounced a job as a result of realising that They had got that job more because They were white (& White) than because They were the best candidate for that job? Whites don’t do this because They don’t want to admit that it’s true. That would then mean that They are either racist as such or merely complicit in racism – both of which are more or less the same thing because they lead to the same result. Whites would rather live with Their race guilt than ever conceive of packing a job in because of its racist nature. They believe that the guilt can be overcome by the pretence at a pro-diversity stance.

Whites never admit that when They commit atrocities against races or peoples, it’s nearly always voluntarily. But when Blacks do it, it is nearly always because They’ve been coerced into it. This proves that Whites know that what They do is wrong, and are trying to engage in an ethical bypass of that very wrongness with the Classic White Moral Evasion as “I was only following orders!” It also proves that Blacks who commit atrocities but don’t blame it on orders believe that what They do is right and that They have a perfect right to act badly. Either way, Blacks are nothing like as bad moral evaders. The Lords’ Resistance Army, for example, committed its atrocities largely through forcing its captives to kill others or be killed themselves. But it’s hard to find an example of a White who’s been forced into a killing spree at the point of a gun; proving that Whites do this willingly and without the necessity of compulsion or compunction. This proves the essential sickness at the heart of White Culture. This is because White Culture is a socially-conformist culture and such cultures are always inherently National Socialist.

Whites never admit that They’re perfectly prepared to accept the legacies of the past that They can use to label Themselves as good – like improved sanitation & healthcare. But refuse to face the bad legacies of the past – like racism & emotional repression. The tv series What the Victorians Did for Us is a classic example of this since it elides the bad in favour of the good as if only the good can ever be a legacy of anything. In which case, why are there just as many bad people today – proportionally - as there has always been?

Whites will never admit that they use Their widespread concealment and denial of Their racism as a form of emotional blackmail. This is to say that Whites will use such camouflage – if successful – to blame Blacks for not integrating nor trusting Whites. That is, “Trust us, now! (Or else!)”. Problem is, of course, is that you can suppress a fact but you can’t suppress the fact that you are obviously suppressing a fact. (This is revealed when Whites try to explain Their behaviour with self-contradictions.) And it is this fact that makes Whites inherently suspicious and distrustworthy.

Whites never complain about positive discrimination (affirmative action) for Whites – practised for centuries. But call it racism if Blacks practise and/or demand it.

Whites never admit that They can be institutionally racist when They're perfectly prepared to admit that They can be institutionally anything else. Alone, among all the political aspects of life, racism is a practice apart from all the others: Contextless, ineffective, non-existent. Call Whites institutionally class-conscious, They're perfectly happy to accept this, but not racist. Even racist organisations like the BNP (British National Party) claim not to be really racist! Whites are perfectly prepared to accept that one's childhood can determine one's adulthood but not that having racist parents can ever do the same. No White has ever gone on record to justify His racism by claiming it's because his parents were. Uniquely, They claim it was Their own choice. (How oddly similar to homosexuals.)

Whites never like to admit that Their whining about Black Victimology is no more than a perfect example of White Victimology because all racists unjustifiably see Themselves as victims of anyone different from (ie, better than) Themselves.

Whites never admit that when They’re ostensibly talking about others, They’re really talking about Themselves. This can be seen when They criticise other cultures – it’s always in direct relation to Their own and not the standards of the culture They criticise.

Whites never admit that because the UK is institutionally racist, blacks have no incentive nor reason to be in any way patriotic towards a country that hates them.

Whites never admit that when They condemn Positive Discrimination for Blacks – but never de facto positive discrimination for Whites – Whites are being racist.

Whites never admit that there are no white whistleblowers of White Racism – only black ones. They refuse to admit this because that would reveal for all to see that Whites have no commitment to the policy of removing racists from Their ranks – because They covertly agree with the principles and practises of White Racism.

Whites never admit that Their whinging about 9/11 reflects Their view that White Deaths are always more important to Them than Black. Whites would certainly never invade another country, for example, just because a few thousand Blacks were killed.

Whites never admit that They refuse to change by claiming that They already have - although there is not a shred of evidence that They ever have. White Racism always becomes more evident in time of war - as it did against the so-called Yellow Peril during the Second World War - because the Japanese are not, never have been and are unlikely to become, white. This is why if a white has his head cut off by Raghead terrorists; this is proof of the inferiority of the terrorists’ culture. While if whites behave in a similar fashion, it’s no more than an isolated incident, not indicative of how wonderful white people really are. However, an ongoing string of so-called isolated incidents of racism equals a pattern of institutional racism that can only be designed by a madman - a White Schizophrenic. If Blacks do it once, then all blacks are like that; but Whites have to do it at least dozens of dozens of times before Whites run out of excuses for Their Institutionalising of Their racist double-standards.

Whites never admit Their hypocrisy even in the teeth of the evidence: http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4916455-103550,00.html

Whites refuse to admit that Their continuing problems in Iraq are the result of an illegal occupation, although Whites - if They had been occupied - would behave in exactly the same insurgent manner. This means Whites still believe Blacks are different in Their motivations and, therefore, in Their psychological and genetic makeup. Such refusals to admit White Racism are proof of ongoing White Racism.

There is no Racists’ Anonymous nor is there any psychiatric counselling offered to White Racists for Their psychological problems. Indeed, Whites stubbornly refuse to categorise racism as a distinct mental illness while – simultaneously - claiming that there is such a thing as Black Psychosis to justify Their locking-up more Blacks than Whites in mental institutions. This proves that Whites do not believe that White Racism is sufficient a problem to justify such activities when every Black knows otherwise from Their own experience. Every Black has had at least one experience of White Racism during Their stay in the UK. This amounts to some 4,800,000 people (8%) and so represents that many experiences. Far fewer whites, as a proportion of the population (92%) have had similar experiences. In comparison, all whites have had some experience of White Social Snobbery, which is why saying White Culture is institutionally class-obsessed is non-controversial - as all political artefacts are non-controversial to whites if they have ever experienced them. Because whites rarely experience racism at a personal level they, not unnaturally, assume it does not really exist and is, therefore, greatly exaggerated by Blacks. This proves the limitations of experience as a means of apprehending reality. And why Whites rely on experience - in the face of logic and the evidence of other people’s experience - to remain in-denial about the inherently-racist nature of their culture.

Whites never admit that Their accusations of Blacks having chips-on-Their-shoulders about White Racism are really claims that the actual experience of Blacks produces such chips. This denigrates all experience that Whites want to pretend doesn’t really happen. It also privileges White Experience: If you don’t come to terms with experience, it self-traumatises you; if you do, then it becomes a learning experience. Whites thus claim that Their experience does not produce chips-on-the-shoulder because Whites are genetically superior in Their response to experience than Blacks, who’re allegedly traumatised by the White Claim that They are. Such accusations are racist when applied to optimally-functioning human beings that actually do experience Institutional White Racism.

Whites never admit that only Whites ever say there is less racism now than in the past. Whites believe that this allows Whites to ignore Black claims to the contrary.

A man’s very highest moment is, I have no doubt at all, when he kneels in the dust, and beats his breast, and tells all the sins of his life. Oscar Wilde (1854-1900), Anglo-Irish playwright, author. De Profundis (1905), a letter to Lord Alfred Douglas following Wilde’s trial and imprisonment, written in prison.

Whites never admit that They have no personal stake whatsoever in playing the good host and helping Blacks integrate into the UK. Yet, Whites constantly blame Blacks for not integrating into a so-called culture that will never recognise Blacks as equals!

Whites can’t bring Themselves to admit that comments made by Blacks about Whites are more valid than those made by Whites about Blacks because Blacks know more Whites than Whites know Blacks.

Whites never admit the fact that the reason Blacks rarely praise Whites isn’t Nigger Ingratitude – as Whites would love to think – but White Racism.

Whites try very hard to explain the non-existence of a Black BNP (British National Party) - something They would like to exist as a vain means of proving the validity of racism, as such. Their constant claims that there is such a thing as inverted racism proves this. In other words, for example, if Blacks can be shown to be anti-Semitic, then Nazism (the ideology and practice of the Nazis, especially the policy of racist nationalism, national expansion and state control of the economy) - in Their twisted minds - instantly becomes justified because Blacks are doing it, too. (When Frank TALKER was at school, it was common practice for teachers to berate pupils who claimed that because one child was badly behaved, other children still couldn’t claim the false ethical-protection of such statements as: “He did it, too!” They were right, so this proves White Racists are those who have never yet left childhood behind.)

It is the confession, not the priest, that gives us absolution. Oscar Wilde (1854-1900), Anglo-Irish playwright, author. The Picture of Dorian Gray, chapter eight (1891).

Whites never admit that the absence of white whistleblowers for White Racism proves Whites lack commitment to the possibility of renouncing Their racism.

If blacks don’t need racial awareness training, what does this say about whites who do? It says that the reason whites resist calls for such training is because it automatically puts whites in the position of being required to learn something. Not just about their own racist attitudes, but learn this from blacks – whom they consider inferior (which is why such training is offered in the first place). To put it anther way, the denial of the need for such training is proof of the need for such training because it’s a denial that there’s any racial problem at all.

If racist Police Officers are very much in the minority – as racists in the general population are claimed to be, why are there so few whites blowing the whistle on racism in their midst? Surely, if racism were of declining influence, no White would ever fear losing his job for blowing the gaff? But They do, which proves that They know perfectly well that if They side with Blacks regarding racism, then They will be treated as Niggers are. This They fear because They recognise – as They simultaneously deny it – that White Culture is institutionally racist. In reality, whenever anyone proves institutional White Racism, they’re arrested – as we saw with the case of the BBC journalist who proved that Whites are still recruiting racists into Their Police Service (http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/news/pr040305_secretpoliceman; http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3210614.stm; http://www.blink.org.uk/docs/secret_policeman.htm).

Whites never admit that they always judge the world from Their own point-of-view as in things allegedly being different after 9/11. But things are never different after events that happen to Blacks. Whites don’t want to admit Their own culpability for 9/11.

There are no situation comedies on tv dealing with the issue of racism as there used to be – Love Thy Neighbour and Till Death Us Do Part, for example. There are sitcoms about white men behaving badly, keeping up appearances and office life – all of which deal with prevalent contemporary issues – but none that whites will make dealing with their generalised disgust for blacks. Strange that!

Whites never admit that they have - historically - been the racist race.

There are things to confess that enrich the world, and things that need not be said. Joni Mitchell (born 1943), Canadian-born US singer, songwriter. Independent (London, 13 May 1988).

Whites never admit that because They are largely responsible for the culture in the UK, They are largely responsible for its ultimate failure that They choose to blame on immigrants.

Whites never admit that They have no sense-of-humour when their lives are threatened; yet when Blacks are killed, the Internet and the working man’s club is full of jokes about dying Negroes.

Whites never admit that racial minorities do not need the protection of the law. When they do, such as through the Race Relations Act, racial divisions become institutionalised by authorities keen to act as “neutral” arbitrators and thus sustain existing divisions.

Whites never admit They had to pass a law – the Race Relations Act – to try to remind Themselves that Blacks are human, too. It’s a tacit admission that Whites didn’t – and still don’t – know this, since this law hasn’t been repealed because it’s still seen as being needed – even by in-denial Whites. Without the existence of White Racism, there would’ve been no need for such a law.

There’s never any mention of a successful person’s skin colour if they are white. For example, there are two types of author: Successful Authors & Successful Black Authors. This is the same when a successful person originates from the lower-classes - as if being born Black or being born poor makes success so unlikely that this single fact of one’s birth circumstances is worthy of mention. No white can explain this obsession with an individual’s past, rationally. This makes it obvious that Whites believe that character is nothing; birth circumstances everything. This proves Whites are institutionally racist by virtue of the very fact that they experience cognitive dissonance when trying to analyse Their own assumptions about others and, particularly, Themselves. It also proves that Whites - although They refuse to openly admit this - believe that Their skin colour is the default skin colour of the human race. Despite the fact that whites are a global minority (25%) and the fact that the first human remains were found in Africa and so the first humans must have been black.

We only confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no big ones. François, Duc de La Rochefoucauld (1613-1680), French writer, moralist. Sentences et Maximes Morales, number 327 (1678).

Whites never admit that They only ever engage in any activity for personal benefit (being mercantilists rather than true capitalists). This is proven by the fact that no White Political Activity in at least the past 500 years ever solely benefited any one, or any other, race.

Whites never come out and express Their open disdain for either the British Empire or the North-Atlantic Slave Trade. Need Frank TALKER say more? Well, OK. Yes He does. The current wealth of the UK - now below that of the Chinese - is based solely upon both systems of mercantilism. Mercantilism is distinguished from capitalism in that it is based on a concept of trade where one side gains and the other loses. Such a system can never work unless backed-up by military force. Note the similarities with today’s White Use-Of-Force in those countries whose inhabitants have darker skins than the Whites. As well as Their unchanged concept of trade, which claims that Wogs must open their markets, but that Whites can still enforce tariffs on the free movement of people, goods and capital. In contradistinction, capitalism is the concept of trade in its true sense: A mutually beneficial exchange between grown-ups where - by definition - both sides benefit. Clearly, therefore, Whites still wish to maintain Their former Empires behind such things as the so-called war-on-terror, The Commonwealth and foreign aid. This proves They have not understood capitalism any more than They have understood democracy. Both of which They falsely claim to have been practising for many centuries; hence, Their sanctimonious and pompous belief that they are fit and proper persons to teach others how to practice these things. But notice, when foreign elections go against White Interests, Whites try to topple democratically-elected regimes as soon as They can. Their White God (not a jealous but a racist God) told them to, obviously.

Whites never admit that liking Them is not compulsory.

We have left undone those things which we ought to have done; and we have done those things which we ought not to have done. Book of Common Prayer (1662). Morning Prayer, General Confession.

A final, more personal note: When Frank TALKER criticises Whites, La TALKER’s critics launch personal attacks concerning how racist He obviously is! When Mr TALKER criticises Blacks, His White Critics remain silent. This proves my White Critics are profoundly racist since They - inconsistently - only try to defend Their own race from racism; while caring nothing for any other race. Have I got ‘em by their racist balls? You bet I have! (And yet, despite everything Frank TALKER has to say here, Whites are still amazed that Blacks do not trust Them! What would Sigmund Freud [Austrian physician and founder of psychoanalysis who theorised that the symptoms of hysterical patients represent forgotten and unresolved infantile psychosexual conflicts] have to say about that?) Mr TALKER should like to add an instant quote of his own: You cannot obtain absolution unless you confess your sins.

Postscript: Let Frank TALKER stir the pot some more and point out the last piece of Black Denial noticed by Him. Regarding the upcoming UK CEHR (Commission for Equality & Human Rights), Blacks claim that having no guaranteed race committee will move Black Issues to the lowest political priority - in Their experience. They’re right. but They never point out the corollary of this which is that the Race Relations Act - which They salute - also means that Black Defendants are more likely to be imprisoned under it. For longer, than White Ones committing similar offences. (Because Whites want Their revenge on Blacks for reminding Whites how racists Whites truly are in the need to pass such laws.) In other words, that a measure designed to help Blacks is actually being used against Them - as They claim the CEHR will be. Why the inconsistency?

A vampire may not enter a house into which he has not been invited, although after he has done so once, he may make repeated visits without asking. So, do not let evil into your minds nor racists into your homes.

Ultimately, to racists, it is not what you are that matters – they have no way of knowing what you are because they don’t want to get too close to you – but what you’re not: Not White. This is why racism is such a negative philosophy because it has no positives. Therefore, never waste your time looking for proof of White Racism because this is harder to find as White Racists become more sophisticated in concealing it. What you need to look for is proof of the existence of the dog in the night-time from its non-existent bark.