Muslim Cricket Test

'SCHOOL TEACHERS are to force Muslim children to take sides with lessons involving imaginary terrorist plots'. Because Whites have decided against interning Muslims, They now have to try to keep them under watch rather than under lock & key. They try this with such racist wheezes as racial integration and condemning those who do not condemn threats to Whites loudly and clearly enough – while never setting a benchmark for how loud and clear such condemnation must be. Whites now feel the need to introduce effective loyalty tests against those They hate. Yet, those They hate can never pass because Whites hate Them and assume They will always be disloyal – not because They cannot be trusted but because Whites hate Them. Hatred is the greatest smoke generator in history hence the common - & racist – White Saying: There's no smoke without fire. All that hatred is designed to do is to create the necessary smoke – a figurative hallucination; a fact when dealing with literal fires – and use this self generated smoke to create the fire that Whites can use to convince Themselves that Their pre existing hatred is not paranoid – as it really is – but justified. Even if every UK Muslim passed such tests with flying colours, Whites will still say that They are lying in order to pass the test. Therefore, it does not matter what Muslims do regarding these tests, They will not be believed. All the fuss this article is making over such tests is as pointless as the tests themselves, since the existence of only one Muslim fundamentalist is required to convince Whites that all Muslims are fundamentalists. The issue is that the tests serve no War-on-Terror purpose, they exist to blame all Muslims for the fears only Whites have which They have created for Themselves. 'The proposals raised fears of a creaping (Sic) surviellance (Sic) culture in which teachers could come under pressure to reveal the identities of Muslims children who sympathised with terrorism'. Apart from the misspellings, we already live in a surveillance culture. We have more public cctv cameras than anyone else does and, at a deeper level, Whites are constantly looking at each other for social clues as to what behaviour is acceptable and what is not. Whites are not concerned with objective reality but social reality. Their method of awareness is that if someone they want to like them says it is so, then it is so. Whites determine what They wish to believe based on Their desire for social acceptance and the fallacy that being socially well adapted means that one is mentally stable. This is why so much White Psychiatry is focused upon getting on well with others as opposed to getting on well with oneself. And this is why Whites are so obsessed with pathologising Black Behaviour as Sectionably anti social because Whites have no other life other than the social; hence Their lack of moral integrity. In the White Mouth, the expression "Anti Social" means anti White. All White attempts to protect society are nothing more than attempts to protect Whites. 'Critics pointed out that the government did not seek to "educate" Catholic children in Northern Ireland about the dangers of sectarian violence but instead moved to achieve a political settlement'. This neatly shows the racist hypocrisy involved in allowing Whites to support terrorism, since Martin McGuinness hasn't been asked to renounce violence, while condemning Muslims for failing to do so. 'The government needed to deal with real causes of terrorism, such as the war on Iraq and Afghanistan and segregation caused by economic policies, rather than brand young kids as terrorist symathisers (Sic)'. This is naive since Whites want someone else to blame for the fact that They have created the terrorism that They can never defeat, since no serious terrorist organisation has ever been defeated. To avoid this inevitable fact, They pretend that a whole class of people can be used as scapegoats for the Great White Failing (Racism) and, therefore, as an excuse for it.