Tuesday, 28 August 2012

Obama vs. Whiteness

(2012)


The problem of color is always the biggest challenge faced by non-Whites in a White supremacist culture.

Whites do not believe non-Whites are truly US citizens - and never will. This needs repeating to ensure present and future generations get the message that Whites cannot be trusted because they will always favor positive discrimination for themselves (ie, White supremacy) and not for anyone else (ie, Anti-Racism).

There needs to be a movement on from stating the obvious simply for the sake of stating the obvious to offering ethnic minorities a game-plan for survival and achievement.

For Whites, the skin pigmentation of President Obama is his most important characteristic. This is proven by the fact that Whites constantly mention it - something they have never done for any other United States (US) president. (His skin colour is also why he has received more death threats than any other president.)

Whites are terrified that President Obama will do more for Blacks because he is Black, even though politicians usually do more for the people who voted for them than anyone else. It would be absurd not to help your supporters and turn to your enemies, after all. But Whites are hypocritical about this since they vote for White politicians precisely because they expect to be helped more than non-White voters.

The political policies of President Obama are less important to Whites - these are simply attacked to disguise the fact that his skin color is more than his policies. This is also why Whites refer to him as “Mixed-Race” because the idea that there is some “White” in him comforts them that he is not as allegedly genetically-inferior as Whites would assume what they call a “Pure-Race” Black is.

But “Mixed-Race” implies “Pure-Race” - a bulwark of Nazi ideology. Because Blacks come in many different shades (as do Whites), Whites know that miscegenation has a long history in the US; meaning they know that many White politicians have had to literally Whitewash their family trees to avoid the social and political ostracism attendant upon having any Black family members. No White politician is “Pure-Race” any more than any other politician would be, yet Whites still peddle the myth that some phenotypes are pure, or purer, than others - and President Obama does not belong to the pure category because “Mixed-Race” means not as bad as those really black Blacks - but still never as good as pure Whites.

It is also important to recognize that Whites who vote for him are motivated by shame about the genocidal nature of the US as well as the desperate belief that by voting for a Black man they can somehow absolve themselves of the attendant guilt. Whites contradict themselves by pretending that the moral stain of White supremacy has now - somehow - been washed away by voting for someone on the basis of their skin color (rather than on the basis of their policies). Whites simultaneously claim they are no longer racist while voting according to race - like the White who says they do not see skin color, but only ever says that they do not to people of color.

US Whites have decided on perpetual war, so government spending has to be cut for everything except the war machine. Whites are the most violent people on Earth, so only they will vote for the Grand Old Party (GOP) to keep their Bond-villain like delusions of world-dominating grandeur alive. But White culture is erotophobic, so it reproduces at a lower rate than ethnic minorities; rendering such dreams impossible of achievement.

Better to start such articles with a bulleted list of Whiteness before proceeding to the real issues. Otherwise ethnic minorities are doomed to waste their time focusing upon people they do not like which, historically, usually means becoming like them - as the Zionists have become regarding the Palestinians in Israel.


Copyright © 2012 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Saturday, 18 August 2012

Whites Masturbating
(2012)



There is no gene for ethics or morality, so this is just more of the scientific racism one has come to expect from Whites.

There is no proof that genes determine character so this is really a eugenics program to kill-off those one does not approve of. This scientist claims the existence of practical ethics as if there could be such a thing as impractical ethics. Only when ethics is universal can such an idea work, since one could easily - as the Nazis did - conclude that Homosexuals, Jehovah's Witnesses and Freemasons are unethical and destroy them for not being Aryan enough.

It is important for science to stop dabbling in politics unless it has objective proof of its assertions - which it clearly lacks here.

The ethics one claims to be able to produce children to be better able to fit, need to be not practical - whatever that means - but objective. Human beings have never agreed on this and science has never provided an objective basis for such a determination. Moreover, a moral obligation can never exist because morality is about choice, not duty. To claim that such a thing does exist is to tacitly admit one does not understand ethics and that one does not behave in accordance with any of its tenets – precisely because one does not understand the moral life.

Claims like Better or More Intelligent have no objective meaning unless they are scientifically defined. Politically, they mean Conformist and Being Less Prone to Disagree. Claiming responsible parenting is based on Nazi eugenics is a paradox since it means parenting would become no longer necessary to produce good people, since parenting is then transferred to the test tube.

If it is bad to cause harm, then genetically-engineered people will not defend themselves when they are attacked by non genetically-engineered people. The latter will, therefore, be dead and dead people can be neither better nor worse.

There is little evidence for the existence of a natural lottery since Natural Selection is considered synonymous with the concept of Survival-of-the-Fittest - nature screens out useless mutations already. Rational design is not a natural extension of screening for physical diseases since the latter is proven science while the former is not.

All of this gibberish comes down to the tacit admission that Whites have failed to produce ethical cultures because of their preference for such things as White supremacy, Social Snobbery, Sexism, Erotophobia, Pornography, Divorce, Adultery, Alcoholism, Drug-Addiction, etc. Because White culture is essentially a failed culture, Whites now want to try to make people good by accepting bizarre genetic theories and then pretend that these can be used to create better people in the laboratory. Could Whites have been more abjectly-explicit than this at their failure to be as good (or better) than other cultures - who do not face these problems to the same great extent Whites do? Whites have clearly given-up on themselves as viable human beings and are now determined to destroy themselves with pseudo-science because of centuries of guilt for not being as superior as they think they are.

Her is a scientist without scientific merit who bases his work on possibilities, suggestions and likelihoods, tied to his own ball and chain of squeamishness (yet who claims genetically-engineered people are less likely to cause harm - how is that for squeamishness?) and irrationality. Like one of the human-hating charlatans who claims intelligence can be measured, this is a desperate and despairing attempt to make genetics a hard science - as opposed to a soft one - because it cannot make the same hard-&-fast predictions about existence that, for example, chemistry and physics can.


Copyright © 2012 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Olympic Hot Air
(2012)



Non Sequitur

Fatima Whitbread was not forced to enjoy Physical Education (PE), yet became a sports star. Yet she claims that children should be compelled to enjoy physical games as an inspiration to the youth of GB (Great Britain). This is a poor means o inspiring the young with basic interest in sports that they can follow outside school, at a more professional level. (Perhaps today’s young should have miserable childhoods to inspire them to perform poorly in academic terms and then, presumably, set themselves up for sports excellence?)

The problem here is the compulsion element Why the need for it when persuasion would be far more productive in enabling the young to enjoy the sports they play and, indeed, anything else? Schools cannot solve social problems like obesity since regular exercise must be self-willed to be successful.

It is better for schools to decide whether the traditional English trade-off between academic and athletic success is worthwhile and whether or not there should be a balance between the two or whether or not schools should focus more on one than the other. Traditional English snobbery means academia is preferred since British universities clearly prefer this form of study; explaining why Great Britain is usually a mediocre performer in world-class athletics. Britain is not about sporting excellence – nor even academic excellence – but about academic uniformity and conformity.

Fatima Whitbread’s argument is also absurd because it posits the notion that people succeed at one thing because they are escaping from something less pleasant. Not success based on free choice of interest, but that based on the same kind of inner compulsions and miseries experienced by serial killers and pedophiles. Compulsion is bad whether it comes from within or from without.

English-leaning politicians also make things worse by being short-termist. They allow a system to fester in which childhood obesity will become the norm; resulting in higher, future healthcare costs. But these costs will be borne after these politicians have either retired or died, so they do not care.

The fact is that Great Britain has decided that athletic achievement is essentially a lower-class endeavor and thus, not to be valorized as highly as academic achievement - as Great Britain has decided that the achievements of Whites are superior to that of Blacks or the achievement of men superior to that of women. (To fund athletic success, Whites would have to fund Blacks. They are not going to do this, so there will be little legacy from the 2012 London Olympics.) A-Levels became easier precisely because of this desire to force academia on children who would have been better-off engaging in more physical pursuits. (The National Curriculum is also a disaster in this regard since it enforces uniformity on the non-uniform; ie, children) And sports clubs are seen as a part-time, less important endeavor, not an alternative to academic schoolwork. This is the real problem here, not compulsory PE.


Copyright © 2012 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Monday, 6 August 2012

A Woman’s Orgasm Can Save a Man
(2012)



Classic tale-wagging-the-dog from Whites who love to confuse sex with desire; need with love.

The issue here is not that men cannot give women orgasms, but that they do not want to because they fear a woman’s sexual pleasure will liberate here to have sex with partners with a better sexual technique because women want sex more than men. Women collude in this by getting angry when men look at and/or fantasize about other women, rather than coming to terms with their own sexual inadequacies in these areas.

Women’s pleasure also produces feelings of jealousy and fear in insecure men who believe personal relationships are all about give and take. If the woman gets more pleasure, then the man has been socially-conditioned to feel cheated of his enjoyment.

Too many men lust after women not for the pleasure they can share, but for the joy they can take or give; resulting in politics being introduced into the bedroom, while spontaneity and sharing fly out the bedroom window. Sex then becomes mutual masturbation and nothing more.

Gynophobic men wish to keep women in sexual ignorance to make it far more easy to control them by suggesting that no other man would be better and that any experimentation on their part would amount to sluttishness and resultant social ostracism. Thus, women must keep their sex lives a secret - even from each other; resulting in a quality of sexual enjoyment that is inversely-proportional to the quantity of sexual experience.

This is how White men control White women and try to ensure regular sexual contacts without the necessity to improve as a sexual partner in the real world of sexual competition. This relates to the White male fear of Black men, given that Whites clearly see that Blacks are not emotionally- and sexually-repressed - as Whites are.

Deep down, White women know that White men are scared of the cunt because of their often quite pronounced mother fixations and homosexuality. Making a woman come will not boost male confidence, it will give men the sense that women’s body are machines that can be manipulated as easily as cars or computers. It will not make them more loving, tender or psychologically secure.

White boys are having problems growing-up in the West because they are attracted to the safe world of pornography and computer games where embarrassment, shame and guilt are sublimated. These things then become increasingly popular in a vicious cycle of sexual-health decline.

You can teach any amount of technique, but you cannot teach desire. This is why Pandas are so difficult to mate in captivity as well as in the wild; suggesting that Whites are becoming something of a living fossil because of the destructive affects of Christian a-sensuality and need for social control in order to obtain any converts at all. For Blacks, of course, this is of great benefit since it means less Whites being born and, thus, less White supremacy.

In the end, if you have to give remedial classes in such things as parenting, then you know the point of no return has already been reached and that, therefore, such curative solutions are not real solutions at all. Better to employ preventives that abolish all the Freudian and Christian nonsense about sex and give children all the prophylaxis and contraception they need.

Whites know this is never going to happen because White self-repression is endemic and so sharing sexual pleasure becomes harder than climbing Mount Everest.


Copyright © 2012 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Sunday, 5 August 2012

White Culture



Don’t Buy into It...

Whites are scared that their culture is finally going down the toilet of history, so now they seek to gain attention by being as provocative as they can about how superior they are despite the decline. They see no other way to deal with their failings other than to pretend that they do not really exist while, simultaneously, concluding that they are caused by others.

Creating victims via inappropriate aggression - where none would normally exist - is essential to Whites. Otherwise, they would have no-one to contrast themselves with nor to feel superior towards.

Whites love this sort of rubbish and it is, therefore, essential reading for Blacks since it shows them what Whites are really like - under the skin; saving them the necessity of getting to know any Whites to ensure ones distaste of them is factually based so that Whites cannot counter any accusations of White supremacy laid against Whites by saying that the (Black) accusers do not know any White people.

That so many White women (teachers) read the newspaper is proof of how retarded they are and explains why the UK education system is in the mess it is in.

This is the kind of bile that Whites will produce given that their culture is based on self-hatred and the resulting self-delusion. This is why Whites rarely read non-White newspapers, in case they see themselves as others see them, which would be even more frightening than the content of The Daily Mail.

The other unstated problem here is that print journalism is dying; hence, the desperation to maintain - and possibly even increase - circulation by printing White self-indulgence in the only form of expression open to the volitionally emotionally-repressed and the only non-spontaneous ethnic group: The claim that the world owes it a living by accepting second-class citizenship as a birthright so that Whites can be superior by default and with as little effort as possible. This is Whites letting off steam because of the workaday mundanity of their insular lives.


Copyright © 2012 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Thursday, 2 August 2012

How Whites Think


Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance...

The reporting is White supremacist precisely because that is how White culture is.

Whites will always claim bad White behavior is individual while bad Black behavior is collective: Whites do not see Blacks as individuals. And Whites commit most of the pedophilia so want to distract attention from their own collusion in the rape of their own children.

The guilt problem is that Whites produce many children who put themselves in danger through bad parenting, yet Whites prefer to claim that the racism of others is at fault and not poor quality upbringings. Ethnic-minority pedophile groups can prey on White girls because they are the easiest, not the Whitest.

Whites never learn from their own history because they have developed selective memories. Whites still wish to scapegoat entire communities for the White failure to develop a culture that is worthwhile rather than simply rapacious. This is why Whites confuse legality with their culture, in the vain hope of legalizing White supremacy.

Despite the lack of evidence of a component of racial aggravation in these cases, Whites still choose to believe that when Blacks commit crimes against Whites it is always racially-motivated. They believe everyone else is as racist as they are on an It-takes-one-to-know-one basis.

Such reporting does not create White supremacy, it is merely a reflection of it. White culture would have no substance whatsoever without its irrational fear of others. That is, in fact, the definition of White culture: Xenophobia.

Whites do not deny that their culture is White supremacist - realistically, they can’t - they will simply defend it with any irrational nonsense to preserve the very sense of superiority causing the problem in the first place.


Copyright © 2012 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

About Us:

My photo

Frank TALKER - Truth-Teller