Sunday, 1 January 2017

Damonsplaining

How Caucasians Navigate the Choppy Seas of White Guilt

M att  Damon and Miley Cyrus could never accept that their success is anything but the result of a meritocracy which Whites have never practiced. To believe otherwise would mean Whites accepting they possess no merit other than that which they claim they possess, but which they cannot prove they actually do.

Yet, Damon is promoting his career by talking the shite he benefits from: Fools like him should take their own advice and keep their personal opinions to themselves. But because Whites think themselves omniscient, they do not feel the need to listen to others because they think they already know everything.

As Whites must suppress their truly-human natures in order to be loyal to (& continue benefiting from) White supremacy, Whites require others to repress theirs – on the false basis that White culture is a protection racket where one will not be abused so long as one obeys Whites. Not so that these others can be successful in an emotionally-repressive White culture, but so that Whites can appear greater than the then similarly identity-deprived ethnic competition. This allows Whites to hide their quintessential mediocrity behind the facade of fitting-in with other Whites; while hopefully avoiding the invidiousness of seeing others enjoying themselves. Like the puritanical, Whites are terrified that someone, somewhere is having the fun that they are not.

This bigoted discrimination means the hated groups must do as they are told by those who hate them as a vain means of not upsetting the bigots, despite the hated groups not being the cause of the bigotry. This would mean, for example, heterosexuals going out in public while homosexuals must hide in private.

This means Rupert Everett never got the role of 007 because he is gay, not because the Bond producers are homophobic. This means that Black people should hide the fact that they are Black – to further their careers. And that women should conceal their breasts and vaginas to further theirs. In other words, be less like yourselves and more like White people; ie, hate your own nature just as much as they hate theirs. Matt Damon thinks the sun shines from his arsehole, so believes that if only everyone else were like him, they would be as lovable as he obviously thinks he is.

Matt Damon is a moron of epic proportions because when Whites reach adulthood, they cannot determine – objectively – whether their success is either 100% due to their skin color, mostly due to it, partly due to it or entirely the result of merit. Not knowing leads Whites to doubt any talent their fans imply they possess; making them angrily-delusional in accepting the White belief that White culture is meritocratic and that their success is actually 100% deserved. In this needily-neurotic way, White self-distrust seems to be evaded, yet the doubts and the doubters remain – to be vainly attacked with the White supremacy that increases with age whenever anyone points out that the emperor is actually a nudist.

The only way for Whites to avoid such a painful realization is to claim that Black people possess no merit Whites need to respect and imply, therefore, that White supremacy is somehow justified because Whites are the only people with any real merit. No evidence that White supremacy is merit-based is ever adduced because Whites want (& need) to believe their own self-fulfilling hyperbole about themselves, since hype is all they have.

This White self-delusion neatly avoids the need to create the meritocracy Whites do not really believe in. Simultaneously, it is used to claim that Black people’s claim that diversity is better than White supremacy is seen as a threat to Whites’ non-existent meritocracy, because it is based on the implication that Black people are trying to obtain something-for-nothing. Yet, this is precisely what Whites are trying to obtain by making the false claim of possessing inherently-meritocratic political instincts.

The schizophrenia of not wanting a meritocracy, while claiming they already have one, demonstrates that Whites want to believe that White supremacy is the only kind of meritocracy possible. The fact that White supremacy induces laziness – by attempting to nullify both any kind of competition & any fear of losing – is evidenced by the White resentment Whites confer upon successful Black people whenever a more-or-less level playing-field actually does exist (eg, in music & sport), since these prove that Black people are just as meritorious as Whites or, worse for White egomania, moreso.

In other words, American Whites imply that when Blacks were slaves, Whites were happy meritocrats who are now being emotionally blackmailed into giving Blacks more credit than they actually deserve. White self-delusion claims that Institutional Racism is meritocratic; that employing Whites is always based on merit; &, that employing Blacks is always based on skin color. All this to avoid the guilt-ridden reality that Whites believe their automatic merit resides, primarily, in their skin pigmentation and that such affirmative action is only bad for Black people.

The inevitable-because-well-founded realization – when Whites are successful – is that Whites achieve mostly because of the Affirmative Action of White supremacy, not because of any actual merit. And that, therefore, any Black failings are the result of their non-existent genetic inferiority. In the same way that White women know that White men are programmed by White supremacy to find only White women sexually attractive, they can then twist this political fact into the metaphysical fantasy that this is because White women are actually the most beautiful of any ethnic group.

Mediocrities like Damon and Cyrus need to believe such nonsense, otherwise they would realize that their success in life is based on little more than their skin color. This would be a White guilt-inducing blow to their fragile egos that few Whites can effectively deal with because White supremacy does not provide Whites with the psychological wherewithal to honestly face the objective reality outside their reality-denying heads.

Thursday, 3 March 2016

O J Simpson

(2015)

Summary: Critique of “”.

What upsets Whites about the OJ Simpson criminal trial is that his guilt had to be proved – beyond a reasonable doubt – which it was not. Previously, Black guilt had merely to be assumed and asserted by Whites to be accepted as a form of proof – by Whites – in a White supremacist justice system in which proof of Black guilt was never really deemed necessary.

If OJ Simpson had murdered Black people, his guilt or otherwise would not so enrage Whites. As it was, it appeared a Black man was getting away with murder which, heretofore, was seen as a White man’s sole preserve: 99% of White lynchers were never tried for murder and few Whites were outraged by the Rodney King beating. Whites now fear that Black people will be allowed to murder them (& get away with it), as Whites continue to murder Black people (& not be punished for it) to this day. A racial dread that Whites are not prepared to live with; while angrily‑demanding that Black people do just that – regarding voracious White supremacy; resulting from the non‑crime of being Black.

Whites, here, are not concerned with such weighty matters as evidence or proof, merely with Black guilt; ie, the White belief that Black people are automatically guilty and that criminal trials of Black people are a waste of White people’s money and time.

A mostly‑White jury found Simpson civilly‑liable for murder; while a mostly‑Black one found him criminally‑innocent. Whites simply cannot bring themselves to believe that Black people are rational enough to present the correct verdict; ie, one politically‑acceptable to Whites. This is why the OJ Simpson criminal verdict was the only one after which Whites demanded IQ tests for jury‑members – they have never done this when a White is wrongly‑acquitted of murdering a Black person. Black people will always judge cases on the basis of ethnicity; while Whites will always judges cases on the facts – something that can easily be shown to be historically‑false.

Monday, 12 October 2015

Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner
(1967)

RATING:80%
FORMAT:DVD

Subtle appreciation of White middle-class bigotry

Sly looks from a White cab driver, when the central couple kiss, begins this journey into white racial paranoia and self-repressive blackness. It gleefully exposes the self-serving hypocrisy of allegedly well-meaning White liberals and their Negrophobic obsession with skin color.

Essentially a romantic manifesto about the never-ending and endemic struggles of White liberals to come-to-terms with and whitewash the White supremacism of their own culture - from which they, too, benefit. The script also struggles with the issue of institutional White racism and wisely decides to leave that to the audience's imagination since, if you do not know what the characters are referring to, then this movie is clearly not for you since you obviously do not come from around here.

The basic theme is Social Acceptance versus Happiness: Race politics being precisely the same today, despite the optimism shown here, as it was then. The film humorously confronts White supremacy as an institutionalized condition of White culture, yet there is an unacknowledged problem the White-written screenplay tellingly creates for itself.

Sidney POITIER’s character is so perfect, that any objection to him marrying a White woman must be racist. But why would such an accomplished Black man marry a White nobody?

It is because Whites believe the only equality possible between the two is that a Black person must work hard to overcome the limitations of being a Negro, in order to match the innate and already-achieved perfection of any White - no matter the White’s actual lack of personal achievements? And, moreover, that such a relationship is of political benefit to the Black, but of little utility to the White.

That the Black character here is actually superior - in many ways - to all of the Whites shown is ignored since it would mean a) that a Black can best a White; &, b) that the Black man here is actually slumming in a culture that is beneath him.

Yet, despite this hypocritical White-liberal whining, this is a well-cast movie all-round, with Katherine HEPBURN and Spencer TRACY convincing as the real couple they actually were - and funnily-written by William Rose.

Thursday, 27 August 2015

Political Correctness

(2015)

White Whine for Beginners

Hypocritically disregarding their own political correctness (PC) in telling others what to think without supporting rights or logical justification, this is the usual White whine about alleged inferiors getting rights Whites exclusively covet for themselves.

‘Our country’ is, of course, a Whites-only political formation: Whites will never use the word ‘our’ to include People Of Color (POC).

If PC is an attack on White free speech, why are so many Whites free to condemn it? The White fear is that they will be penalized for speaking freely, as if this kind of punishment were somehow new for this kind of speech and as if Whites had a right to consequenceless actions when all acts imply the risk of censure.

Whites resent being penalized for the free speech they have traditionally punished others for invoking - and are really only taking here about free speech for Whites. (When, for example, Whites are attacked for being racist, one quickly sees how much commitment Whites have to the free speech of others in their attempts to shut down the attack.)

Whites blaming Marxism for their own penchant for PC is a typical White intellectual dodge in trying to hide the inherently-PC nature of all White cultures - the PC belief that Whites are genetically-superior to everyone else - and that this is to be believed by all, come what may and evidence to the contrary.

The author does not say what the ‘cohesive elements of our [White] society’ actually are. They do not exist, of course - except for the shared PC belief that Whites are superior to everyone else. This helps Whites evade the issue that White culture will always be repressive and illiberal. He denies the existence of activities like racism, sexism & classism by suggesting that civil rights for POC has done ‘untold damage to ‘our [White] society’ by giving freedoms to unnamed ethnic groups (eg, POC) whom he obviously believes should not have them.

The author makes further unsubstantiated claims about British education being liberal, when Blacks have been systematically-encouraged not to take it up. His claim the UK police are not institutionally-racist proves he has never been abused or harassed by White police officers simply for being Black. And is a claim made despite the wealth of evidence that Whites, as such, are just as institutionally racist.

The usual resentful White supremacist claptrap about Travelers and undocumented migrants is well to the fore in the form of statements not supported by evidence. He is resentful that White humor, typically racist, has been neutered; clearly indicating his approval of such racism and his belief that free speech includes the ability to deliberately offend, hurt & abuse others, for no particular reason, when this is something few Whites would countenance for an instant. Whites will not tolerate jokes about terrorists as Whites board planes since it is White lives that are threatened, but they will tolerate plenty of jokes about POC receiving state welfare benefits. He does not clearly define what (the fiction) ‘not real abuse’ is especially when compared to ‘real abuse’ - which he thinks does not exist in his Nazi fantasy land. He even claims there is such a thing as ‘true racism’ - what would untrue racism be like, one wonders? He implies that he is a racist, just not a ‘true’ one - and that feminists attack ‘men as rapists’. As white males imagine they are emasculated by feminism, Whites imagine they are no longer able to engage in Manifest Destiny because of anti-racism. LIke all racists, pedophiles & rapists, he simply wishes to peddle his nonsense without being punished for it.

The ultimate resentment here is that if those whom Whites consider non-people, with no rights Whites need to respect, get everything Whites get, then Whites will have lost something they can never get back, rather than the full rights and responsibilities of being fully human which Whites, for 500 years, have run away from. Whites will have lost the pseudo-Edenic childhood world where they could do as they please - without consequences - and are now forced to face the real world of adult responsibilities and pleasures. Whites accept the extra rights given them by White supremacy without complaint, yet refuse to accept the necessary responsibility for the victims of that White supremacy, nor the inevitable White guilt the very existence of such victims cause - except by whinging to their hearts’ content about not being able to bully people they do not like, legally.

Whites refuse to see that economics is the basis of everything - not their needy emotions - and that focusing on wealth-creation is the only way to create, protect and progress any culture wishing to remain viable.

About Us:

My photo

Frank TALKER - Truth-Teller