Friday, 9 January 2015

White Supremacy

Year:
2015
Outstanding Performances:
ente…
V. Smith…
Premiss:
We do not care what color you are, so long as it is White.
Themes:
Alienation
Communism
Destiny
Emotional repression
Ethnicity
Free Speech
Identity
Loneliness
Materialism
Narcissism
Nostalgia
Political Correctness
Republicanism
Sexual Repression
Snobbery
Solipsism
Stereotyping
Totalitarianism
White culture
White guilt
White supremacy
Similar to:
@whitewhines
White Whine

More White Whine with Your Fish?

Thin-skinned Caucasians playing the Race Card of believing only they possess the right to Free Speech

Response to these Claims of Playing the Race Card:

Apolitical statements to others are White delusions: They do not exist because all communication with others is political. White comments decrying politics are, in themselves, political; while making claims without evidence is just as bigoted and just as rant-like as Whites are regarding those Whites do not agree with.

For Whites, their Identity politics (ie, White supremacy) is the solipsism which pretends it is not the least bit political; while serving the all-important political end of White reality-evasion.

Whites invented the Black-only Race Card to allege Blacks gain an advantage from doing using it - without explicitly stating what that advantage might be lest it reflect badly on Whites. The truth is, of course, that the Race Card is a product of White Guilt, since Black people cannot use their skin color to advantage in White culture as Whites can (by claiming the Race Card is being played) - such an implication further implies that White supremacy does not exist.

It would be interesting to know, for example, how Whites imagine Blacks could benefit from a Race Card when Blacks control no institutions in any White culture in any of the 52 White-ruled countries of the globe? In reality, such a claim allows Whites to benefit from the White-only Race Card by implying all complaints of White supremacy are inherently false; making Whites, thus, inherently true. The White-only Race Card thus serves the dual purpose of allowing Whites to perpetuate the political benefits of being openly-racist (the manner in which racism flourishes best) while denying that those very benefits exist. It is a Card only Whites can use.

The Race Card is simply a desperate means for Whites to evade debate about the benefits they all receive from White supremacy (since there are no rational arguments in favor of it) in the hope that White Guilt will recede in its aggressiveness. But the universal anger with which Whites make such claims proves this political gambit does not work; only making matters worse for them.

The power of such a non-existent Card is really the power of paralyzing White Guilt; solely the product of Whites as a direct result of the inherent amorality of their various cultures. It is, in fact, an inevitable product of White amorality.

Whites demand that any discussion of White supremacy is to be umpired by Whites - to achieve their desired goal of not feeling guilty about how they benefit from unearned privilege (& then blaming Blacks for the impossibility of achieving such a goal). Hence, the White invention of a psychologically-soothing Race Card that, somehow, can only be played by Blacks since, when Whites play it (via White supremacy), that is just how things are (& are supposed to be). If Whites feel bad, Blacks are playing the Race Card; if Whites feel good, Blacks have learned their lowly place in the great White scheme of things. A Card that only Whites can play - alleged to be playable by all - is an example of the only racial equality Whites practice: The unfounded allegation that Blacks are just as racist as Whites.

Whites take political commentary personally because their culture conflates the Personal with the Political; the Public with the Private; to more easily cheat people into working for a social acceptance - from Whites - that never comes and is never intended going to come.

The urge to stereotype others is strong in Whites because it helps them feel they have overcome their fear of others; while persuading Whites that they need not listen to anyone other than themselves in possessing a right to attempt to deny others the same rights they possess; eg, so-called Free Speech.

Whites need, desperately, to live in a contextless vacuum in the hope that no blame attaches to them for anything, whatsoever, and everything that happens, anywhere, can be blamed on someone else; rendering political commentary as inevitable as it is necessary. Indeed, under the tenets of Free Speech, such commentary it cannot - reasonably - be disallowed. Except by those political correctoids who wish to escape politics; that is, reality. To deny this is to fly in the face of the White concept of Free Speech - another reason to invent the distraction of a Race Card (& its necessary handmaiden Political Correctness) to evade the fact that Free Speech for non-Whites is being attacked.

Political-correctoids are not free agents, so never act like ones. They fool themselves into thinking they can tell others how to think, speak & behave. They have no substantive arguments and simply rely on reality-evasion to psychologically-support their lifestyles built on sand.

If Frank TALKER wrote a review of the movie Casablanca without mentioning Hitler, Nazi Germany and White totalitarianism, the PC-brigade would be happy. Problem is, Frank TALKER lives in the real world, not Hollywood.

Political correctoids need to look-up the meaning of the word Politics in a good dictionary, since they endlessly make political points while condemning others for so doing.

Whites live on the basis that their obsession with fantasy were more important than reality. Their talk is all despair at finding the world will not conform to their übermensch desires; hence, their wish to compartmentalize experience in such a way that real-life is successfully-elided - at least in their Bond villain dreams.

How else to account for their endless, unjustified complaints when others do not think, act or talk as they do? Or their making false claims about others without evidence. Or their need to mock others - who can see right through them - with irony, satire & sarcasm. Or their need to destroy the competition rather than beat it.

It is not necessary to agree with others – that is the totalitarian dream represented by Political-Correctness. It is, after all, a simple matter to refrain from reading that which is not agreed with or to disassociate oneself from those one is not compatible with. But that would mean accepting others’ right to self-determination - something Whites find impossible to do.

Whites are more concerned with White Gilt than they are with Black lives: So long as non-one mentions the Racewar, Whites could care less.

Non-Whites and Jews avoid Whites precisely because they do not wish to be killed, mocked or brainwashed by Whites; hence, White resentment when a White supremacy alert is issued against any product of White culture because it means few find Whites trustworthy; making them feel lonely and psychologically-adrift as humans. (One of the curious by-products of Whiteness is the White penchant for pet-ownership along with the search for extraterrestrial life - to counter their self-willed, lonely-at-the-top existential ennui - rather than adopting the simpler expedient of making friends here on Earth with their fellow humans.)

The truth is that Whites only favor Free Speech when it flatters Whites.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER.
Permission granted to reproduce & distribute this posting in any way, shape or form; provided you mention this Blog
All other rights reserved.

Tuesday, 15 April 2014

Left in Dark Times

(2008)

A Stand Against the New Barbarism

The New Barbarism blames the victims for their own condition and so tries to justify White supremacy...


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Tuesday, 4 March 2014

Thursday, 27 February 2014

White Guide to Writing History

(2012)

The world revolves around them...


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Wednesday, 26 February 2014

Current Arguments About Slavery

(2011)

How Whites evades their various issues with Blacks...


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Saturday, 22 February 2014

Blacks According to Whites

(2010)



Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Thursday, 20 February 2014

Are the British human?

(2010)


Only just!


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Wednesday, 19 February 2014

Kenneth Chamberlain

(2012)

Whites will always fear their betters more than ever be put into words...


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Tuesday, 18 February 2014

White Man’s Burden

(2006)

RATING:60%
FORMAT:Book

Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done so Much Ill and so Little Good

Interesting book about Whites and their inability to find a means of effectively helping the Third World; resulting from the White inability to see beyond the profound institutional limitations of both Foreign Aid or Military Intervention - and, indeed, their own limited culture.

Because it is written by a White, he is unable to be honest about the endemic malice and condescension of Whites toward non-Whites. Generalized vindictiveness that causes them to create poverty-reduction plans Whites know are not going to work: Plans designed to disincentivize large-scale migration of Third World poor and to prevent non-Whites from becoming economic competitors in global Capitalism. The War on Terror makes things worse because Whites imagine (as they do regarding their own countries’ crime rates) that terrorism is caused by poverty. That the causes of terrorism are actually the self-same foreign intervention (supposedly designed to alleviate poverty) is conveniently and deliberately elided.

The book also fails to compare - in depth - Foreign Aid with Domestic Welfare such that the similar reasons for the failure of both remain unilluminated. Moreover, White guilt and White narcissism are not assigned their due place in explaining why Whites want to save the world, but have no plan for saving the world from Whites. Whites wish to recreate the world in their own image and so fantasize about being Aryan supermen: The only kind of people Whites imagine can achieve such goals. Utopian for Whites; Dystopian for everyone else. Rather than look at the actual problems of others, Whites choose to see others only in comparison to themselves; presenting a distorted view of objective reality.

The author’s political naivety stems from a belief in the essential goodness of Whites, a belief that only Whites, themselves, possess. As well as their neurotic inability to divorce Intentions from Acts such that preaching what to do becomes a greater goal than actually doing anything. Whites seek a mirror in which to permanently admire themselves; ignoring the suffering they claim to be alleviating as the only means of evading their own inner emptiness. This is why Whites rarely focus on outcomes but on intentions, since positive outcomes are harder to find.

The author’s realization that self-directed and organic development is the only way forward for the world’s poor (as practiced in the First World) is likely to go unheeded. Detested Whites (like Bob Geldof & Bono) are far too keen to publicly remain at the center of their own vain pipe-dreams of sainthood than they are to actually listen to the poor. Helping the world’s poor by funding the poor’s own ideas for development - since the poor are the only people who understand the situation on the ground because of their daily experience of it - keeps Whites from hogging the limelight and, hence, is not favored by them.


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Friday, 14 February 2014

Miyamoto Musashi
(1584 – 1645)


Man of many parts...



Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Star Whores

(2000)

RATING:40%
FORMAT:DVD

Volume 1

Average looking and skinny White girls chewing on each other’s exquisite lady-parts: Some moaning in sexual pleasure more convincingly than others.

Firm, well-developed titties and sweet suckable nipples are well to the fore, but the acting is as poor as the lesbian science-fiction satire. And why do White pornographers keep thinking of sex as something filthy or dirty?

It will give you a semi-stiffy – to be getting on with – but do not expect much more from a movie that thinks sensations are a lot more important than fulfilling sensual pleasure.


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Sunday, 9 February 2014

White Whine

(2004)

Why Whites whine so much...


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Visioneers
(2007)

RATING:60%
FORMAT:DVD

Somewhat amusing satire on the superficiality, social inadequacy, lack of imagination, anomie, ennui, spiritual emptiness, the emotional repression and the violent tendencies of Whites - and their fundamental desire to preserve a way of life that is inherently miserable for fear of the hard work involved in any suitable alternative. The movie works quite well as metaphor for the War on Terror and Globalization and their attendant paranoias by suggesting that without a generalized fear and ignorance of unknown others there would be no way of life worth preserving.

Overall, however, this movie never really gets beyond being an example of the very things it satirizes. The best it can manage is the Hippie dream of a reversion to childhood and the resultant drapetoresponsia.


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Saturday, 8 February 2014

Giardino dei Finzi-Contini
[Garden of the Finzi-Continis]
(1970)

RATING:80%
FORMAT:DVD

Banality of Evil

Engaging film about White moral evasion in the face of the underlying White supremacy of their culture and its effects on their ability to be happy and that of others simply to continue existing. Here, Whites retreat into a literal fantasy Eden in order to banish thoughts of the real world from their desired carefree existences.

Film is also about the White emotional control needed to live within the political limitations of a culture as ethically-limited as White culture; conforming their emotions and friendships to the prevailing political orthodoxy, such that Whites appear as hollow-eyed in their personal relationships as they do in their political ones.

White politics makes personal relationships impossible because of this desired emotional repression, since Whites have to conflate the Personal with the Political to achieve social acceptance; making Fascism an inevitably White psychological illness and morbid obsession. By abandoning the needs and benefits of the Family to those of the State, Whites doom themselves to La Gabbia.

Fascinating as a companion-piece to Il Conformista.


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Chato’s Land
(1971)

RATING:80%
FORMAT:DVD (Cut version: UK)

Interesting and subtle film about the destruction wrought by White supremacy and the self-destructive ways it produces in Whites.


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

OBAMISTAN!
Land Without Racism:
Your Guide to the New America
(2010)

RATING:80%
FORMAT:Book

Amusing and accurate satire on non-Black culture.


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

News:

Loading...