Wednesday, 18 February 2015

“All schools must promote ‘British Values’”

British Values

White Values

“British Values” is a code phrase for “White Values”:

  1. Looting;
  2. Rapine; &,
  3. Genocide.

Whites are so bad at studying their own history because it makes them feel nothing but guilt. Easier to pretend that the past does not matter and evade the issues thrown up by it.

Of course, Whites are conflating Values (qualities to be achieved) with Virtues (the means of achieving Values), here, to imply that merely possessing values negates the need for the virtues that necessarily prove the existence of the values; since Virtues are sole means of expressing Values. For example, the Virtue of Honesty expresses a commitment to the Value of a purposeful life. Here, Whites are trying to act like bad Christians who preach Christian Values in public; while practicing immoral Virtues (ie, Vices) in private.

As UK Whites conflate Church & State (Personal/Political; Virtues/Values), Whites also confuse political loyalty to the State with personal loyalty to them: A brazen attempt to make anyone not White a lapdog and a slave of Whites. Conflating the Personal with the Political means Whites taking Political comments Personally. The view that all of life is give and take and nothing is to be shared explains White hostility and loneliness when others disagree.

Why Now?

Why did Whites not teach their children so-called British values before? Because defining Britishness is quintessentially un-British since such British values do not really exist and because Whites assume all Whites think alike - as they assume all People of Color think alike - so there is no need to teach what is already (supposedly) known. The idea is to teach those whom Whites fear the most, not teach everyone - otherwise what would be the point of such teaching.

As usual, Whites are trying to foist their fantasies of ethnic superiority onto others and claiming that to do so is natural and normal, in the process. And that anyone who disagrees should be discriminated against.

White paranoia

Whites are terrified of those they share the UK with - especially Muslims - and the inevitable White paranoia caused by 500 years of continuing White supremacy haunts the White imagination because Whites now full well that such bad behavior will have negative consequences - for them.

Brainwashing

Like Whites in apartheid South Africa, UK Whites need to placate their own racist xenophobia by feeble yet frequent attempts at brainwashing People of Color (eg, Citizenship Test), in the desperate hope that such people will not seek revenge for the Institutionally-racist nature of all White cultures - throughout the world.

Whites want that everyone should be loyal to them and do as they say. Multiculturalism (ie, racial segregation) makes this impossible; hence, the White resentment of it since it makes the re-enslavement of People of Color impossible.

Moreover, in all this talk there is none of Whites renouncing White supremacy as the royal road to communality. Because Whites cannot find it in themselves to give up on the only means of appearing to win every argument: Never having to take People of Color seriously.

Whites are also terrified that People of Color will out-breed them and, thus, be able to tell Whites what to do in a first-past-the-post electoral system, at which point Whites will clamor for the PR they have always rejected in the past because they were in the majority. Brainwashing People of Color is, thus, also designed to ensure People of Color think, talk and act like Whites so that People of Color will kowtow to Whites (ie, accept White values as universal values) to compensate for the decline of White culture.

One can only wonder and imagine at the kind of loneliness and alienation that compels Whites to try to force others to like them as recompense for Whites not liking themselves - or each other.

British Education

The problem with implementing such value-laden nonsense for Whites in the UK educational curriculum is that British education is riven with institutional racism. White teachers do not want to educate People of Color; preferring instead to exclude them whenever legally possible.

People of Color will be invited to state that they accept White values - particularly, White supremacy - or be subject to social exclusion by Whites. Such exclusion is already practiced by Whites, on the assumption that People of Color will not accept White supremacy - a completely correct assumption, as it happens.

White claims

Whites claim the following as “British Values”, when they are really nothing more than utopian aspirations:

  1. Democracy; ie, so long as Whites are the majority;
  2. individual liberty; ie, the liberty to infringe the liberty of others;
  3. political freedom; ie, the freedom to impose freedom on others via force;
  4. mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs; ie, those whose beliefs are not White; White being the standard against which all other beliefs are judged. This was not displayed by those White morons who proclaimed Je Suis Charlie;
  5. gender equality; ie, the hope that White women will not start having sex with Black men to get back at White men for their sexism;
  6. equality before the law; ie, laws created solely by Whites;
  7. respect for the rule of law; ie, laws created for the benefit of Whites;
  8. personal & social responsibility; eg, accusing scapegoating others of moral degeneracy when Whites get drunk, take drugs, have sex with children, etc; &,
  9. respect for British institutions; ie, those created by, and for the sole benefit of, Whites which People of Color are not allowed to criticize otherwise they are to be told to leave the country.

Of course none of these claims is particularly British; making claims of there being otherwise inherently false. It is, after all, difficult to find Whites practicing any of these virtues in real life; ie, the reality outside of White fantasizing. Nor does one find Whites giving examples of these alleged values.

White Supremacy

Obviously, Whites are not going to mention their sole source of cultural identity: White supremacy. To admit that this is the underlying British Value would be a stroke of honesty for which Whites are not famous since it would be a tacit admission that Whites actually possess a complete lack of values; while giving People of Color a perfect for having nothing to do with White Values at all.

White supremacy creates the very real problem for Whites that no White can ever fully know himself. He can never know, for sure, if any success he achieves in life is more the result of his abilities or more to do with the unearned help he gains from White supremacy. This explains the White inability to grow up as the direct result of this lack of self-awareness; explaining their penchant for divorce, suicide, child molestation, etc.

White Propaganda

Moreover, there is no talk of virtues that reflect these values because Whites do not practice the values they claim to possess; hence, their embarrassment and inappropriate aggression at vainly trying to enumerate values they never display. Whites do not reference Rationality, a purposeful life nor Moral Choice as British Values; tacitly revealing the moral emptiness at the heart of this all too White debate: The Manifest Destiny of implying Whites have the best values (regardless of whether they are actually practiced or not) and, so, are the most fit to rule the world.


See Also: Dear Mr Gove: What’s so ‘British’ About Your ‘British Values’?

Monday, 16 February 2015

What Would It Take?

(2010)

White People are the Best People

Summary: Critique of What Would It Take?.

The usual conflation and confusion of the terms America with White, along with the claim that there is a Darwinian race for survival between different ethnic groups despite the lack of any evidence for this.

The author never explains why the decline of White culture is a problem other than to pretend that the world would be worse off without Whites.

This writer resents anyone not White and assumes they will all treat Whites as badly as Whites have always treated them - a claim made without any evidence.

He chooses not to see his White supremacy as a form of the very Positive Discrimination he rails against; merely seeing it as natural and normal and the way things are.

If not natural, then his version of what is natural should be enforced in his implication that it is best to:

  1. Keep White women at home as brood mares to keep Whites numerically superior;
  2. only allowing Whites to migrate to the US;
  3. abolishing divorce;
  4. anti-miscegenation laws; &
  5. criminalizing any sexual congress between members of different ethnic groups.

Like all those without a valid cultural identity, he desperately needs to believe that White culture is somehow universal; while refraining from learning the obvious lesson of his own claims of White decline: White inferiority. He is happy to see Whites always numerically-dominant, but hates to see anyone else dominate because of theirs. A man with no moral compass who refuses to encourage Whites to work harder to compensate for their failings but, instead, to penalize non-Whites for their successes - which he clearly believes are unearned and only come about because of Affirmative Action - again, without any supporting evidence.

Like all racists, his only recourse is to whine, since he has no solution to Whites’ increasing global irrelevance.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER.
Permission granted to reproduce & distribute this posting in any way, shape or form; provided you mention this Blog.
All other rights reserved.

Monday, 9 February 2015

Charlie Hebdo

Whites are Charlie Hebdo

Free Speech ain’t Free

All Actions Have Consequences

Hypocritical White revulsion at the murder of twelve Whites for exercising their White-given right to Free Speech is expected to grow; consistent White revulsion at Whites who mock the religious beliefs of others is expected to decrease.

Whites are still asserting their right to offend, but not to be offended - all to evade the fact that Whites use offensiveness because they know they are going to lose any argument attempting to justify their right to offend - so they might just as well be offensive from the get-go.

Whites still have yet to learn the difference between mockery and criticism, because the latter would be to admit that what is being attacked is worthy of fair treatment - not something for which Caucasians are famous.

Conflating the Personal with the Political means Whites taking Political comments Personally. The view that all of life is give and take and nothing is to be shared explains White hostility and loneliness when others disagree. Only Whites believe they possess the right not to be offended, which is why White Websites are so heavily moderated - in case the truth finds its way in. Thus, by claiming the alleged right not to be offended, Whites claim the right to offend - to offend those they fear most. When Whites talk of Free Speech, the mean Free Speech for Whites - others must keep their mouths closed on pain of death.

Whites now increasingly find that they have to justify their behavior rather than expecting it to be automatically accepted as normal. Non-Whites and Jews have always had to be careful what they say, within White hearing, for fear of being killed – now Whites are getting a taste of their own medicine.

Western Whites never have to self-determine since White supremacy is a given for them and only requires the effort to blank-out reality and pretend White guilt was invented by Black people to make it work. Yet Whites now suddenly find their cherished belief that Whites are entitled to speak as they please is not as consequenceless as they had hoped.

Whites will cower: Nothing makes one shut up more than the threat of being killed for speaking out. Whites call it Terrorism precisely because they are the ones terrified. As with White supremacy, Whites will bite their tongues and evade the issue rather than face the fact that they are not truly civilized by virtue of the fact that they initiated the terror in the first place.

No matter how angry and fearful Whites are at Muslims, they will focus more on keeping their White supremacy to themselves in future than in openly-expressing it because few Whites are actually prepared to die for their beliefs – they have always expected others to die for them and their White beliefs.

As Whites are condemned for using White supremacist expressions like “With Us or Against Us”, “Illegal Immigrant” or “Bogus Asylum-Seeker”, Whites now face the choice of abandoning Free Speech for Whites and replacing it with Responsible Speech for All. This will never happen, of course - so more Whites must prepare to die for their White beliefs.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER.
Permission granted to reproduce & distribute this posting in any way, shape or form; provided you mention this Blog.
All other rights reserved.

Wednesday, 4 February 2015

Caucasian Extremism

It can’t be racist if Whites say it isn’t

Do Whites Ever Grow Up?

The Problem with Whites

The problem with Whites is that White supremacy necessitates such a radical disconnect from reality (schizophrenia) that Whites lack basic information about human nature such that they cannot solve the very human problems Whites cause. This makes Whites fundamentally insincere because they then become too stupid to know just how stupid they really are.

White Failure

In the above article, the writer does not tell the reader what the colossal issues posed by Islamic terrorism actually are. They are the fact that Whites cannot win the War on Terror except by imposing racist, Totalitarian laws (internment-without-trial, regular beatings, the reintroduction of the death penalty for treason, police harassment, etc) - and then blaming all non-Whites - for their problems; thereby, revealing, once and for all, the true nature of White culture. How to be racist while appearing to be better than others while pretending to respect other cultures. This is the classic White problem posed by Whites’ lack of a cultural identity - an inner void Whites fill with White supremacy.

White Desperation

The author claims that White, Western society is currently engaging in self-scrutiny (ie, desperately trying to figure out why Whites are losing the War on Terror) while never once mentioning why terrorism exists in the first place: White supremacy. Such scrutiny only extends as far as the end of the White man’s nose - never beyond and is mere psychological narcissism and political solipsism.

Whites are alleged to be civilised, yet few People of Color would agree, since there can be no evidence for such a claim from a culture based on White supremacy. White culture has standards - presumably higher than anyone else’s - while no convincing evidence for their existence is provided. Attacking Iraq for no reason, torturing people just because they are Muslim and White police officers operating an unstated shoot-to-kill policy are not the mark of anything that any rational person could call civilised. But Whites never let reality get in the way of their delusions.

Collective Noun for Caucasians: An Hypocrisy of Whites

The writer is typical of Whites in believing that anyone not agreeing with them is stupid or pernicious. He is upset precisely because he knows it is not the responsibility of Imams to prevent Islamic terrorism - anymore than it is the responsibility of Catholic priests to prevent Republican terrorism in Northern Ireland.

Such responsibilities belong only to those who cause problems; those Whites provoking it by meddling in the internal affairs of Muslim and Arab countries for generations. Trying to get others to solve ones own problems is the mark of a social welfare parasite and a column-dodger. Such a fatuous political position proves Whites powerless to prevent chickens coming home to roost; while placing their own responsibilities on the shoulders of the victims of their White supremacy.

This argument - to be consistent - must mean that since most pedophiles, alcoholics and serial killers are White - Whites have a responsibility to deal effectively with the fact that they have created such people in their (so-called) civilization. But Whites never ask for such efforts from other Whites since that would be tantamount to racial treason - one of the real issues here.

British Values: Looting; Rapine; & Genocide

There is no such thing as British identity, so attempting to get Muslims to be a part of it is doomed from the start. Whites lack a cultural identity of their own; explaining why, for example, they appropriate the dress, music and cuisine of other ethnicities to compensate for the superficiality of their own. There are also no uniquely British values that only the British possess. Clearly, Muslims are apart from British society since British society is inherently racist - because Whites derive fundamental financial and psychological advantages from such racism - and because Whites are terrified that if White supremacy were renounced, People of Color would start treating Whites as Whites have treated People of Color for the past 500 years. The racial segregation practiced by Muslims is merely a survival tactic - one that works - and is supported by Whites since it lessens the chances of their children marrying people Whites disdain.

Islamophobia

This article possesses no rational argument against Muslim claims and merely gainsays and mocks them - without evidence - as if one could prove a negative simply be repeating it. Such a racist viewpoint contradicts what the writer is pretending to say and is precisely why Muslims will never trust Whites. Attempts by Whites to be nice (by writing patronizing letters as warm as… could possibly be) to Muslims are like the scorpion telling the frog he will not sting him if he agrees to carry him across the river. Now that Whites need Muslims to fight a war they cannot win on their own, they descend to a Uriah Heep-like ingratiation.

Canting platitudes & hypocritical piety

Whites believe that Muslims secretly rejoice at Jihadist military success. Whites try to conceal this by creating a distinction between true Islam and those other so-called rag-heads who are currently winning the War on Terror. They claim that Britain would be diminished without its strong Muslim communities, but this was never said in times past: It is pure cant. As is: British values are Muslim values. White underpants are now filling since Whites are now targeted for their skin color (as non-Whites are: R [European Roma Rights Centre] v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport); making them acutely-aware that they possess an ethnicity which they have heretofore denied having - in the interests of appearing above other ethnicities. Now that Whites are forced to concede that the term “Ethnic” also applies to them, they are quite unsure what to do or how to behave in public; hence, the hogwash about Keep Calm & Carry On as if nothing has changed; while simultaneously pretending everything has changed.

Partnership in a Shared Enterprise?

This special White use of the language of the beggar is exacerbated by this writer’s implication that problems in any community are caused by fringe elements - despite the fact that these fringe elements (eg, White supremacists) still often benefit everyone and, so, are tolerated by the majority. [M]ajority tolerance can never, after all, come from people who benefit from intolerance. People of Color, Irish Republicans and North-American Indians, for example, have discovered this to their cost.

So why, exactly would Muslims engage in such a shared enterprise, unless the benefits are clearly spelled out? No reason is given, other than the White need and the White belief that it is everybody’s duty to sacrifice their own interests for the benefit of Whites - no matter how badly Whites have treated them in the past. Water under the bridge for Whites, but rational people have a long memory and once-bitten; twice-shy means they might forgive but they would be fools to forget.

Conditional Tolerance

This pretend White celebration of pluralism and the unsubstantiated claim that Englishness is the principle of diversity itself (despite, for example, the British Empire being no better than the Third Reich) means Muslims must be ever-vigilant for the oleaginousness unctuousness of Whites. One has only to survey the lack of diversity in BBC programs, for example, to see that Whites do not believe anyone not White can be British; hence, the fact that the BBC only makes tv shows for White-British and not Black-British.

Whites do not consider Muslims British because Whites consider Britishness and Whiteness to be synonymous since White culture uses superficial criteria like skin color to judge character. Whites confuse and conflate Nationality with Ethnicity, so that one has to be Caucasian and speak English fluently to be British - one or the other is not enough. This makes permanent outcasts of entire communities who have done no wrong.

Caucasian Extremism

Rather than face-up to the mistrust of Whites in the Muslim community - the same kind of intellectual dishonesty the writer condemns (in others, but never in himself) - this writer simply condemns Muslims for not seeing how truly wonderful Whites really are - underneath. And if they cannot see this, then they really [have] a problem.

Yet, it is Whites who really have the problem since they refuse to listen to others. Whites think themselves above criticism, so do not believe they have to refute any. They bask in their own feelings of superiority, while believing the distinction between what is said and what is done never applies to them, so that Whites should only be judged by what they say, while others are only to be judged by what they do. Moreover, that Whites never possess ulterior motives for anything they do because they are the glittering representatives of a self-evident Master Race.

If everyone has a responsibility to tackle extremism, why do Whites not have this responsibility? Making such a hypocritical claim is an example of extreme White supremacy, since it is designed to favor Whites at the expense of anyone else who suffers from extremism. How Whites could ever possibly imagine that those they fear would ever deign to help them in times of hardship is a mystery that only a team of psychiatrists - working round the clock for at least a year - could ever solve.

Rhetorical Games

There is no irresponsible misrepresentation of the [UK] Government position here - only a weary reluctance to believe that a racist ethnic group (White) and a racist state (the UK) could be serious in wanting to co-operate with Muslims, when Whites have never done so before and never did so in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. Of course, Whites are not going to let these facts deter them from condescending to Muslims when Whites cannot get their own way - either by torturing Muslims to death or desperately seeking Muslim allies now that the War on Terror is being lost and Whites, thus, shown as helpless in the face of the inevitable historical comeuppance that is Islamic Fundamentalism.

Can Whites Stand on Their Own Two Feet?

There is no moral or intellectual argument presented here for the fundamentally-absurd claim that Imams must protect Whites from the blow-back from Whites’ own racism - which Whites, themselves, believe they have no responsibility to ameliorate. If Whites were really serious about winning the War on Terror, they need only do the following:

  1. Renounce White Supremacy; &
  2. give the terrorists what they want.

The problems would then largely disappear. But that would mean Whites having to stand on their own two feet and not rely on their belligerence to cow People of Color to their will.

White Fear of What They Cannot Control

This writer then concludes by contradicting his claim of the existence of a Britishness of multiple identities, uncontaminated by fundamentalism, is possible, as well as necessary when, all along, he claimed that this had already been achieved - but only by Whites. There are no White political movements for achieving this end - and never have been. The truth is that what Whites really want is a “Britishness uncontaminated by Muslims”. The hard, jagged questions posed by Islamist terrorism are never clearly stated because these are:

  1. When are Whites going to stop fomenting the very wars they continually-whine about? &,
  2. When are Whites going to face-up-to their serious shortcomings as a people?

Since Whites are unable to trust those they fear, one can be certain that if Whites were winning the War on Terror, they would not waste their time sucking-up to their alleged enemies. Whites enjoyed the benefits of their racism for centuries while ignoring Muslim complaints about White supremacy. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, Whites are brown-nosing because it is their lives that are now in danger. (Certainly, for example, when the BNP were causing problems with race relations in Britain; forcing People of Color to live in fear of their White neighbors, few Whites gave a damn about Black lives) One can be certain that when such condescension fails, Whites will revert to type and indulge their penchant for violence and threats of violence.

All Actions Have Consequences

Whites need to put their own house in order before suggesting others do likewise. Normally, for example, when one is trying to eradicate a disease, the following activities must be undertaken:

  1. What is the exact nature of the problem? &,
  2. what is its source.

Whites have done neither because they lack the honesty to admit their own part in the troubles which currently assail them - like the smoker who sues the tobacco company because he has developed lung cancer despite the warnings posted on all cigarette packs. Facing reality is always tricky when one has been brainwashed into thinking that reality should not get in the way of ones wishes.

Some of My Best Friends are… Muslim

Make no mistake, Muslims are being offered nothing save the phony hand of friendship that Whites always proffer when they want something-for-nothing. This White author is typically-ignorant of other cultures and tries to tell Muslims what to do - or else. Not only does he know little of Islam (since other cultures do not matter to Whites) he does not know any Muslims personally because he does not wish to know why Muslims do not help nor trust Whites - despite the answer always being blindingly-obvious: White Supremacy. A form of supremacy that has disabled Whites from living-up to their full potential as human beings for centuries, is the basic reason they never grow up and why each succeeding generation has to face the violent backlash against their supremacist attitudes.

Absence-of-Evidence Proves a Negative?

This article is nothing more than a desperate attempt to prove a negative in the absence of any evidence of White good will or desire to trust others who do not share their skin color, values or language. Yet, Whites accuse Muslims of lacking trust! This author does not mention Stop & Search as another source of distrust; implying that he agrees with such racist police tactics. Nor does he mention White supremacist immigration controls. If Whites distrust Muslims, Why would not Muslims distrust Whites?

Bad Faith

If Whites had anything else to offer other than fake friendship and the violation of International Law by war criminals like Tony Blair and George W Bush, they would find Muslims more helpful and willing to join organizations like the military, the police and the Security Service. Yet, Whites still expect Muslims to trust Whites, without the necessary corollary of Whites trusting Muslims.

David & Goliath

Whites are still employing Caucasian Fundamentalists to prosecute the War on Islamic Fundamentalism on the same assumption that you can fight fire with fire, after imperialist Whites having lit the fire themselves by sending agents to foreign countries to commit illegal acts out of arrogance, injustice, self-delusion, lies, hypocrisy, greed & xenophobia.

Unless Whites make not helping them a crime, one can hardly blame Muslims for not trusting Whites and preferring to remain safely ensconced within their own communities.

If One Does as God Does, One Becomes as God Is

None of these basic statements about the nature of being human matter to White writers, only their desire to recreate reality in their own image and hope that others will go along with their inane fantasies - with the necessary stick (but no carrot). When Whites realize Muslims care for them about as much as Whites care for Muslims, Whites will then have grown-up and learned to face the political music they have composed.

The very fact that Whites feel the need to write such a letter to the MCB - they would never write such a missive to the Church of England - proves Whites know why Muslims self-segregate: White supremacy. Whites ask for Muslim help precisely because they know it will not be granted, automatically, since Whites are perfectly well-aware of their entirely-negative feelings for Muslims - and so are Muslims. Such a request paves the way for further White persecution of Muslims on the basis that Muslims were asked “nicely” to help Whites, yet refused (though Whites didn’t say: “Pretty Please!”).

Because Whites fear Muslims for what they are - not for what they do or do not do - it does not matter what Muslims do (or do not do): Whites fear Muslims precisely because they are Muslims. Because there can be no incentive to help those who fear you for no reason, it is now time for Muslims to write to vicars and ask them to curb Christian extremism.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER.
Permission granted to reproduce & distribute this posting in any way, shape or form; provided you mention this Blog.
All other rights reserved.

Friday, 9 January 2015

White Supremacy

Year:
2015
Outstanding Performances:
ente…
V. Smith…
Premiss:
We do not care what color you are, so long as it is White.
Themes:
Alienation
Communism
Destiny
Emotional repression
Ethnicity
Free Speech
Identity
Loneliness
Materialism
Narcissism
Nostalgia
Political Correctness
Republicanism
Sexual Repression
Snobbery
Solipsism
Stereotyping
Totalitarianism
White culture
White guilt
White supremacy
Similar to:
@whitewhines
White Whine

More White Whine with Your Fish?

Thin-skinned Caucasians playing the Race Card of believing only they possess the right to Free Speech

Response to these Claims of Playing the Race Card:

Apolitical statements to others are White delusions: They do not exist because all communication with others is political. White comments decrying politics are, in themselves, political; while making claims without evidence is just as bigoted and just as rant-like as Whites are regarding those Whites do not agree with.

For Whites, their Identity politics (ie, White supremacy) is the solipsism which pretends it is not the least bit political; while serving the all-important political end of White reality-evasion.

Whites invented the Black-only Race Card to allege Blacks gain an advantage from doing using it - without explicitly stating what that advantage might be lest it reflect badly on Whites. The truth is, of course, that the Race Card is a product of White Guilt, since Black people cannot use their skin color to advantage in White culture as Whites can (by claiming the Race Card is being played) - such an implication further implies that White supremacy does not exist.

It would be interesting to know, for example, how Whites imagine Blacks could benefit from a Race Card when Blacks control no institutions in any White culture in any of the 52 White-ruled countries of the globe? In reality, such a claim allows Whites to benefit from the White-only Race Card by implying all complaints of White supremacy are inherently false; making Whites, thus, inherently true. The White-only Race Card thus serves the dual purpose of allowing Whites to perpetuate the political benefits of being openly-racist (the manner in which racism flourishes best) while denying that those very benefits exist. It is a Card only Whites can use.

The Race Card is simply a desperate means for Whites to evade debate about the benefits they all receive from White supremacy (since there are no rational arguments in favor of it) in the hope that White Guilt will recede in its aggressiveness. But the universal anger with which Whites make such claims proves this political gambit does not work; only making matters worse for them.

The power of such a non-existent Card is really the power of paralyzing White Guilt; solely the product of Whites as a direct result of the inherent amorality of their various cultures. It is, in fact, an inevitable product of White amorality.

Whites demand that any discussion of White supremacy is to be umpired by Whites - to achieve their desired goal of not feeling guilty about how they benefit from unearned privilege (& then blaming Blacks for the impossibility of achieving such a goal). Hence, the White invention of a psychologically-soothing Race Card that, somehow, can only be played by Blacks since, when Whites play it (via White supremacy), that is just how things are (& are supposed to be). If Whites feel bad, Blacks are playing the Race Card; if Whites feel good, Blacks have learned their lowly place in the great White scheme of things. A Card that only Whites can play - alleged to be playable by all - is an example of the only racial equality Whites practice: The unfounded allegation that Blacks are just as racist as Whites.

Whites take political commentary personally because their culture conflates the Personal with the Political; the Public with the Private; to more easily cheat people into working for a social acceptance - from Whites - that never comes and is never intended going to come.

The urge to stereotype others is strong in Whites because it helps them feel they have overcome their fear of others; while persuading Whites that they need not listen to anyone other than themselves in possessing a right to attempt to deny others the same rights they possess; eg, so-called Free Speech.

Whites need, desperately, to live in a contextless vacuum in the hope that no blame attaches to them for anything, whatsoever, and everything that happens, anywhere, can be blamed on someone else; rendering political commentary as inevitable as it is necessary. Indeed, under the tenets of Free Speech, such commentary it cannot - reasonably - be disallowed. Except by those political correctoids who wish to escape politics; that is, reality. To deny this is to fly in the face of the White concept of Free Speech - another reason to invent the distraction of a Race Card (& its necessary handmaiden Political Correctness) to evade the fact that Free Speech for non-Whites is being attacked.

Political-correctoids are not free agents, so never act like ones. They fool themselves into thinking they can tell others how to think, speak & behave. They have no substantive arguments and simply rely on reality-evasion to psychologically-support their lifestyles built on sand.

If Frank TALKER wrote a review of the movie Casablanca without mentioning Hitler, Nazi Germany and White totalitarianism, the PC-brigade would be happy. Problem is, Frank TALKER lives in the real world, not Hollywood.

Political correctoids need to look-up the meaning of the word Politics in a good dictionary, since they endlessly make political points while condemning others for so doing.

Whites live on the basis that their obsession with fantasy were more important than reality. Their talk is all despair at finding the world will not conform to their übermensch desires; hence, their wish to compartmentalize experience in such a way that real-life is successfully-elided - at least in their Bond villain dreams.

How else to account for their endless, unjustified complaints when others do not think, act or talk as they do? Or their making false claims about others without evidence. Or their need to mock others - who can see right through them - with irony, satire & sarcasm. Or their need to destroy the competition rather than beat it.

It is not necessary to agree with others – that is the totalitarian dream represented by Political-Correctness. It is, after all, a simple matter to refrain from reading that which is not agreed with or to disassociate oneself from those one is not compatible with. But that would mean accepting others’ right to self-determination - something Whites find impossible to do.

Whites are more concerned with White Gilt than they are with Black lives: So long as non-one mentions the Racewar, Whites could care less.

Non-Whites and Jews avoid Whites precisely because they do not wish to be killed, mocked or brainwashed by Whites; hence, White resentment when a White supremacy alert is issued against any product of White culture because it means few find Whites trustworthy; making them feel lonely and psychologically-adrift as humans. (One of the curious by-products of Whiteness is the White penchant for pet-ownership along with the search for extraterrestrial life - to counter their self-willed, lonely-at-the-top existential ennui - rather than adopting the simpler expedient of making friends here on Earth with their fellow humans.)

The truth is that Whites only favor Free Speech when it flatters Whites.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER.
Permission granted to reproduce & distribute this posting in any way, shape or form; provided you mention this Blog
All other rights reserved.

Tuesday, 15 April 2014

Left in Dark Times

(2008)

A Stand Against the New Barbarism

The New Barbarism blames the victims for their own condition and so tries to justify White supremacy...


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Tuesday, 4 March 2014

Thursday, 27 February 2014

White Guide to Writing History

(2012)

The world revolves around them...


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Wednesday, 26 February 2014

Current Arguments About Slavery

(2011)

How Whites evades their various issues with Blacks...


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Saturday, 22 February 2014

News:

Loading...