Saturday, 11 July 2015

Race row in mental health service

(2007)

White psychiatrists still Trying to Rule the World - for Whites

white agenda is always a racist agenda

Psychiatry, like police work, is popular with Whites because it allows them to racially-abuse People of Color - legally:

  1. Whites hope that sending Blacks to Coventry, via White supremacy, has the same negative affects on Blacks as it did on Richard Attenborough in The Angry Silence;
  2. White cultural problems (alcoholism, pedophilia, White supremacy, etc) do not equal White psychosis, but Black cultural problems do equal Black psychosis;
  3. Whites claim White feelings must always be taken into account before calling them racists, despite the inherent racism of such a claim and of their feelings;
  4. typical BBC racism;
  5. No Black psychiatrist quoted as agreeing; while the research is conducted by Whites who benefit from White supremacy - a clear conflict of interest:
    1. using People Of Color (POC) to claim POC are more crazy than Whites attempts to hide the White supremacy of those doing the using - Whites know that a White psychiatrist would be accused of racism and believe that a non-White one would not and, thus, make the case against Black people seem convincing - at least to Whites;
    2. no scientific citations quoted here because all of the psychiatrists polled are White;
    3. Whites allow themselves to define the problem-situation, despite the conflict-of-interest embedded in the fact that they benefit, financially, from such definitions:
      1. Would a Nazi scientist in Nazi Germany be believed if he said Jews were genetically deceitful?
      2. rapists are not allowed to define rape, but racists allowed, here, to define racism and its affects - on the intended victim, but never on the perpetrator;
  6. Whites flatter themselves that their racism actually works - as such - and only for their benefit:
    1. Whites imply they are not affected by White supremacy - only Blacks - despite the widespread White guilt and emotional repression necessary for racism to work at all for Whites;
    2. no acknowledgment that racism negatively affects Whites (White guilt, anger, etc) - particularly in the desire to pathologize Blacks - since Whites wish to consider racism normal;
    3. Whites are resentful that Blacks do not suffer the Delusions of Grandeur of White supremacy nor from White guilt, so want Blacks to suffer by inventing Black psychosis - all in a desperately-racist attempt to stop Blacks reminding Whites they are racist;
  7. no denial of the existence of racism, here, only the practical purpose of pointing it out; thereby trying to soothe White fears of Black rebellion:
    1. If it is not helpful to accuse White psychiatrists of racism, why is it helpful to accuse the Nazi party of racism in order to help Jews?
    2. why is it not helpful to call a spade a spade since that is the only way to solve any problem?
  8. fails to admit White psychology has spent much time trying to prove White supremacy natural; eg, via IQ tests:
    1. Whites conflate the Personal with the Political to create a dictatorship of psychiatrists in order to control the Blacks they fear;
    2. attempts to justify the White fear of Blacks inherent in White supremacy by claiming Blacks more dangerous to Whites than anyone else;
    3. Whites claiming the right to fear Blacks because they are more crazy - according to Whites;
    4. psychiatry a soft-science like psychology used to pathologize Blacks as victims of their own inferiority - a new form of drapetomania in which politics is used to compensate for the lack of scientific rigor of psychiatry;
    5. White supremacy seen as normal, Black rage against racism seen as pathological:
      1. Rape victims are not accused of being more crazy than rapists, by rational people - despite the trauma they experience;
  9. Whites automatically receive CSTs because Whites are the standard upon which sanity is judged (conflating White norms with being well-adjusted). Blacks receive ESTs and the belief that Blacks are automatically not as sane as Whites because their culture is different:
    1. implies Blacks will never receive adequate health services - without Whites - despite such services being inherently racist because they are provided by Whites;
    2. Blacks need White help or will never solve their problems - as Jews need Nazis, apparently;
    3. Blacks need Whites - and should not create & use their own psychiatric services;

It is White propaganda to claim that science is practiced in a politically-acontextual manner - as if Whites always and only made objective statements about the world. To believe such a thing is to appease Whites and appeasement never works. Blacks can never be comfortable with White psychiatrists and open-up emotionally to facilitate useful psychiatric intervention  - so Blacks must look to their own social institutions for help.


Friday, 10 July 2015

White Guilt

(1938)

How Whites whitewash their own history...

To where were the Jewish population deported - and whom deported them?


Saturday, 27 June 2015

Black Psychosis

(2011)

Black Psychosis

Summary: Critique of “Black Psychosis”.

Despite containing a good deal of truth about psychosis, in general, this article is a perfect example of the self-hating Black psychosis it reveals: It offers no solutions to the problems raised - not even the obvious solution of self-employment.

The article revels in trying to get Whites to actually like its author as he wallows in the knowledge that Blacks will condemn him for describing what could just-as-easily (by analogy) apply to Whites: I don’t expect much appreciation for writing this. He has allowed himself to be brainwashed by Whites to:

  1. Ignore the implications of historical reality;
  2. tell Whites what they want to hear about Blacks (that the latter are inferior); &,
  3. assume Black people are a special case - even though such claims only ever come from White supremacists.

This article means Whites are entitled to feel their usual range of emotions (shame, fear, anger, paranoia, victim mentality, jealousy, envy, entitlement, exaggerated success, scapegoating, empathy, hopelessness & helplessness), but that Black people are not allowed to exhibit similar or, indeed, a fuller range of human emotions - lest their resultant ill-treatment at the hands of racist Whites thus, somehow, become justified.

Ultimately, this is all part of the White attempt to turn all Black behavior into a form of psychosis to justify the predations of White supremacy - as a form of White self-defense - as well as to try and confound any negative criticism of any behavior exhibited by any White.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER.
Permission granted to reproduce & distribute this posting in any way, shape or form; provided you mention this Blog.
All other rights reserved.

Sunday, 21 June 2015

Holier-Than-Thou Social Parasites

(2015)

Holier-Than-Thou Social Parasites

On Saturday, 30 May 2015, in Tunbridge Wells Public Library at about 16:00 I was seated at PC1 when I was asked by a member of staff to respond to a claim that I had verbally-abused another customer.

I did so but, just in case there is any misunderstanding about the verb Abuse, I offer the following synopsis of what happened:

  1. On entering the library, I went to the ground-floor Booking PC, located near to the public toilets, to check my library account and to book a PC;
  2. the complainant was sitting at this PC, not using it & staring into a mobile phone;
  3. I asked him to move so that I could use this PC; he moved, but was clearly annoyed to do so. This PC did not work;
  4. I then returned a copy of a DVD called Annie (at 15:30 - see attached Returned Items’ receipt below) and went upstairs to use the Booking PC there. This PC was also obstructed by a woman not using it and I asked her to move - she did. I then booked the next-available PC: PC1;
  5. I went downstairs to find the complainant now siting at PC1 - again, not using it; while staring at a mobile phone. I asked him to move and he took the view that I was persecuting him. Nevertheless, he moved away;
  6. PC1 was also not working and it then became suddenly obvious that the complainant was recharging his phone by unplugging library PCs. I could then see that the downstairs Booking PC was not plugged-in: I had been mistaken about it being out-of-order. (It would have been quite a coincidence if the complainant had not also unplugged the Booking PC, since he was clearly looking for free electricity there, as well.);
  7. I reinstated the power supply to PC1 and began to log-in; while the complainant continued talking to me for no valid reason; distracting me in the process. At no point did he replug the PCs he had disconnected from their power supply, nor did he point-out that he had unplugged them in the first place; denying the public use of public facilities - without lawful excuse; yet, whining when challenged;
  8. I rolled my eyes at the complainant’s contumely and he was upset by my understandable annoyance. I asked, in a highly-mocking tone, if his mother had not loved him (this is a lack most-often bedevilling those who believe the world owes them a living). He was upset about this and decided to call the Police - while standing by the photocopier next to PC1 - to claim I had verbally-abused him. After he wandered off, the Police did not appear; hardly surprising since a crime was not in progress and nobody’s life was in danger.

Threatening, abusive or insulting

The member of staff who questioned me claimed that one man’s Abuse is something else to others. This is wholly-subjective and provides no basis for rational action. His apparent lack of any definition of the word Abuse means anyone can be accused of anything by anyone at any time, without the accuser having to prove anything - simply on the basis of their personal prejudice.

However, without such a clear definition, anyone so accused can also just-as-easily claim that they are being accused of nothing and that any complaint against them is frivolous and, in itself, abusive.

The abusive behaviour of the complainant was merely designed to waste everyone’s time since he had been caught doing something he knows he shouldn’t - not because he actually had been abused. Such people possess the erroneous belief that they can be abused, but never abusive.

Under the Public Order Act 1986, there are three offences that someone who uses threatening, abusive or insulting language in a public place may have committed. In order of least-to-most serious:

  1. Section 5 makes it an offence to use threatening, abusive or insulting words within the hearing of someone likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress by them - regardless of whether such harassment, alarm or distress was actually caused;
  2. Section 4A makes it an offence to use threatening, abusive or insulting language with the intention of causing someone else harassment, alarm or distress - so long as it actually has that effect; or,
  3. Section 4 makes it an offence to use threatening, abusive or insulting language with the intention of making someone else believe that immediate violence will be used against them or of provoking an immediate violent response.

I understand the relevant terms to mean:

  1. Threatening the likelihood of physical assault;
  2. Abusive words to belittle, humiliate or upset someone; &,
  3. Insulting as synonymous with Abusive.

Aggravated forms of these offences come under Section 28 of the Crime & Disorder Act 1998; including such items as racial & religious abuse. But I was merely critiquing the behaviour - not the appearance or faith - of someone who believes that public space is for his sole, personal use.

Mockery, satire & sarcasm vents annoyance, irritation & frustration

With me, mockery, satire & sarcasm tends to be an automatic response when the physically-mature start behaving like the emotionally-immature. These are not likely to be offences of Abuse, so long as they are a reasonable and a proportionate response to behaviour initiated by others (otherwise, staff would render themselves legally-liable because of their often-patronising attitudes to library customers).

It is also not a criminal offence to express annoyance, irritation & frustration, as such, especially regarding someone else causing an obstruction, breaking the law and adopting an anti-social attitude - all without lawful excuse. Otherwise, public censure would be a crime.

My approach

My intention was simply to get the complainant away from the PC so that I could use it - not to listen to his whining or to harass him. His clear intention was to prevent others using Library PCs so that he could charge his mobile phone for free. He has probably done this sort of thing before, as he would appear to be aware that verbal abuse can be a crime and that he can use such a claim to distract attention from his demonstrated belief that library equipment is his own personal property by acting as though his rights supersede everyone else’s.

I do not initiate contact or problems with others unless I have no other option. If I am physically attacked, I must physically respond. If someone is in my way, without lawful excuse, I ask them to move and only become insistent if they refuse. If I am verbally-abused, I become verbally-abusive. I was not threatened, so I did not threaten; I was not being directly-abused, so I did not abuse. I was, however, having my time wasted, so I gave the time-waster the suggestion that he strive harder to achieve the emotional-maturity he obviously never learned from his parents, in order to lead a more fulfilling life; ie, Grow up!. This is mockery, satire & sarcasm, not abuse - unless, of course, humour is now to be made illegal?

I prefer to respond-in-kind by giving malcontents a dose of their own medicine. Although not sanctioned by law, I do not have the time to pursue legal relief since that would place me in the same position as a Negro in segregated Alabama desperately-awaiting a Supreme Court ruling to use a Whites-Only toilet - before he wets himself. Instead, time-saving common sense is applied. (I also do not ask staff for help because I have found them unwilling, in the past, to be as confrontational as is often necessary.)

Responding-in-kind is a defence to charges under sections 4A & 5, but not 4; allowing wilful attention-seekers the opportunity to provoke a response & then call the Police. This is a risk I am happy to take since, in the circumstances, I could not just walk away as I am perfectly-entitled to use library facilities. If I did back off, I might just as well stay at home - when not at work. As a Black man, I would then have to accept permanent second-class citizenship status which, obviously, would only occur over my dead body. In any case, the law can always be challenged in court, if push comes to shove - it is a common law country, after all.

Conflating the Public with the Private

An attitude of mind has developed where many customers have come to the erroneous conclusion that the library is their personal fiefdom and space allocated for the use of PC users can be commandeered for their own, exclusive, non-computing purposes. And electrical sockets can be used to illegally-extract electrical units, in contravention of the Electricity Act 1989. For their part, library staff seem to find this PC-blocking behaviour largely acceptable.

The member of staff who questioned me claimed that CCtv would confirm or deny my account of events. But the library video cameras are not marked as such, nor is there any written declaration - anywhere in the building - that such recording is actually taking place: The cameras are as unobtrusive as possible to make their being damaged less likely. So why make such a claim if it is true? If these cameras work, the veracity of anyone’s statements can easily be confirmed or denied - without drawing attention to the means. If not, the implied threat is an empty one.

For Your Listening Pleasure

30-05-2015 is a sound recording (takes about a minute to upload & about 13 minutes to play) of the entire incident to prove that events transpired as itemised above. If your security cameras work, they will also corroborate my story (by proving the audio is unedited) and hopefully lead to the complainant being barred future library use since he lacks the necessary respect, self-respect and courtesy toward other users that makes civilised life possible - or even imaginable. Barred because it is inevitable that once it becomes known - on the local social-parasites’ grapevine - that the local library provides free electricity, more PCs will be disabled by those who refuse to work for what they get.



Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER.
Permission granted to reproduce & distribute this posting in any way, shape or form; provided you mention this Blog.
All other rights reserved.

Saturday, 20 June 2015

Caucasians running out of ideas

(2005)


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER.
Permission granted to reproduce & distribute this posting in any way, shape or form; provided you mention this Blog.
All other rights reserved.

Thursday, 4 June 2015

Genius of China

Subtitle:
3000 Years of Science, Discovery & Invention
Year:
2014
Country:
English language…
Predominant Genre:
Non-fiction
Author:
Robert TEMPLE…
Outstanding Performance:
None
Premiss:
3,000 years of Chinese science, discovery & invention.
Theme:
Christianity
Compassion
Destiny
Emotional repression
Empathy
Friendship
Humanity
Identity
Narcissism
Personal change
Political Correctness
Science
Self-expression
Social class
Solipsism
Stereotyping
White culture
White supremacy
Similar (in Plot, Theme or Style) to:
Unknown
Review Format:
Book

They’re damn clever these Chinese!

Fascinating book that proves history to be cyclic rather than cumulative in that so much of modern science and technology are little more than reinvented and rediscovered advances.

What dazzles most here is the fact that culture, religion and economics have profound influences on science, so much so that despite the Chinese being two millennia ahead of the West in terms of technology, China eventually lagged behind when those same forces came to bear. Such a self-sufficient and philosophically-introspective empire inevitably turned in on itself only to recently reawaken to beat the world economically in a way that it could so easily have done at least 500 years ago.

Where this book fails is in avoiding giving the appearance of being excited propaganda for the current Chinese government - despite its correctly noting the long-term backwardness of European culture. A healthy antidote to Eurocentric chauvinism and yet another reason not to trust White history books.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER.
Permission granted to reproduce & distribute this posting in any way, shape or form; provided you mention this Blog.
All other rights reserved.

Sunday, 31 May 2015

Spooks
(Series 7)

Also Known As:
MI-5
Year:
2008
Country:
United Kingdom…
Predominant Genre:
Thriller
Directors:
Directors…
Outstanding Performances:
None
Premiss:
The missions of UK’s domestic intelligence organization.
Themes:
Alienation
Christianity
Corporate Power
Courage
Destiny
Emotional repression
Ethnicity
Friendship
Identity
Loneliness
Loyalty
Materialism
Narcissism
Nationality
Nostalgia
Personal
Political
Political Correctness
Republicanism
Sadomasochism
Schizophrenia
Self-belief
Social class
Snobbery
Solipsism
The State
Stereotyping
White culture
White guilt
White supremacy
Similar to:
Homeland
Review Format:
DVD

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it

Caucasians will Save the Day - but only in Fiction

Political Correctness Gone Mad

Summary: Eurocentric and Imperialistic Caucasians Pretending they can Defeat an Enemy Without Knowing his Motivations while Doctors are unlikely to Defeat a Disease without Epidemiology.

Series about loyalty to Whites as well as to the rich who continue to expect those most loyal to them to risk their lives for little return.

Whites are shown as being so enmeshed in White supremacy that they fully-realize they will never be accepted by any other ethnic group and so are prepared to die to defend their own - even if this means doing so for people who think them socially-inferior. They are given no social alternative (& are social cowards, anyway), so this is the only sense of human loyalty they will ever know - no matter how false. No clue is ever offered as to why Whites engage in such a perversely-masochistic fidelity to others when there is so little to gain from it.

Whites hate being labeled as racist, yet are only too keen to label others by alleged group affiliation as madmen or jumped-up little fanatics; under-estimating the very enemy that has thrust so much fear into their hearts in order to vainly reduce the dread of terror they spend so much time and money trying to defeat.

No political context is ever offered for the events shown since that would mean the White response to terrorism is more of the same kind of behavior being condemned, as well as the direct cause of the terrorism the characters in the series are ostensibly fighting.

The childish political simplifications of the scripting aptly-reflect the White, cry-baby narcissism of those who refuse to accept their responsibility for the terror they claim to fight as well as the fact that they find second-guessing the terrorists they have created difficult-to-impossible. (There is even the absurd claim that there was only one Cold War, when all of the periods of peace between all of the wars were cold wars.)

Like everyone who fights a losing war, this series pretends threats can be neutralized by fictionalizing them into non-existence. Whites conflate Ethnicity with Nationality to enable their support for White supremacy and its handmaiden Political-Correctness - but what will protect us from White supremacy? No one answers this question because the series supports White supremacy by being promotional propaganda for the UK Security Service, despite the fact that it contains no admission that the so-called War on Terror is a Race war - fought solely for the benefit of rich Whites.

Whites are shown as melodramatically-brave, gratuitously-violent and violently-traumatized by the existential despair they try to inflict upon others via their eloquently-martial cultures. The White characters are fleshed-out to reveal shared suffering (rather than shared joy) as the basis for White culture - a culture lacking in substantive content; hence, the White emotional dissociation here offered as espionage cool; eg, angry enough to aggressively kill, but psychopathically-unemotional immediately afterward.

The largely-mediocre actors struggle to embody their two-dimensional characters sufficiently to make us care about what happens to them. They fail; leaving us stranded in a quagmire of melodramatic gimmicks, narrative clichés and over-acting typical of Western media in its quest for false-certainty and forced-uniformity. Its images are designed to be seen as colorless accounts of knowledge, reality, morality and human nature; while unintentionally and simultaneously revealing how biased and one-sided they are.

In no other major civilization do self-regard, self-congratulation and denigration of others run as deep, nor have these tendencies infected as many aspects of White thinking, laws and policy, as they have in the West - and its overseas extensions. Thus, preventive measures against terrorism are actually impossible for Whites since they cannot study People Of Color (POC) without first denying the humanity of the latter with a political intellectualism bent on self-affirmation rather than objective study. POC are thus never to be understood and, thus, never to be defeated through an understanding of their weaknesses, flaws & motivations. Only by great good luck could the scenarios this series offers ever come-to-pass so that one day Whites will be able to live without the fear of the bombers they have created.

Ultimately, this is not a show offering much hope that the Security Services can protect us from the terror they have been instrumental in creating, since its solutions are purely Curative rather than Preventive.

Really quite laughable.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER.
Permission granted to reproduce & distribute this posting in any way, shape or form; provided you mention this Blog.
All other rights reserved.

Thursday, 28 May 2015

Older than America

Also Known As:
Older than America
Year:
2008
Country:
United States…
Predominant Genre:
Drama
Director:
Georgina Lightning…
Outstanding Performances:
Entire Cast…
Premiss:
Woman’s haunting visions reveal a plot to silence her mother from speaking the truth about the atrocities that took place at her boarding school.
Themes:
Alienation
Christianity
Coming-of-age
Compassion
Corporate Power
Courage
Curative
Destiny
Emotional repression
Empathy
Erotophobia
Ethnicity
Family
Friendship
Genocide
Grieving
Gynophobia
Identity
Individualism
Justice
Loneliness
Love
Loyalty
Materialism
Narcissism
Nationality
Nostalgia
Personal
Political
Political Correctness
Preventive
Republicanism
Sadomasochism
Schizophrenia
Sexual Repression
Snobbery
Solipsism
The State
Stereotyping
White culture
White guilt
White supremacy
Similar to:
Candyman
Poltergeist II
Review Format:
DVD

Evil that White Men Do

Kill the Indian; Save the Man

Summary: Horrorific Psychological Affects of White Supremacy on Victims and Victimizers: The Genocide that Never Appears in White History Books.

Clever horror-movie-that-isn’t-really-a-horror-movie about White supremacy where the abused ghosts of the past return to haunt the present. These ghosts are both the underlying progenitors of ones culture and the traumatized dead who refuse to let the living alone until they are properly laid to rest; making the horror format an ideal vehicle for this story of the return of the repressed.

The depiction of Whites here is spot-on in revealing them to be people who instinctively-believe themselves superior to People of Color POC - in both overt and covert ways such as condescension and the belief Indian land can be exploited without permission, respectively. The irrational selfishness and lack of human warmth is palpable and profoundly-accurate and a perfect analogy to the leech-like nature of Whites within the context of a horror movie.

Whites here are especially affectionless and emotionally-blackmailing as regards other Whites who possess empathic human emotions; expressing the price Whites are expected to pay if they wish to grow to affective maturity: Social ostracism from other Whites.

White attempts to brainwash Native-Americans into believing White is best is shown via so-called Indian Schools whose sole purpose was to destroy Indian culture and history by separating children from parents and brainwashing them into becoming red-skinned Caucasians - or literally kill them. All this to suppress the White guilt feelings concerning the genocide, rape and looting so prevalent in the White sense of who they are: As if Whites are the landlords of the world to whom everyone else must pay rent. (One wonders if Whites invented ECT precisely for the purpose of committing emotional murder of undesirables in the guise of science: A demented desire to forestall revenge for past abuse by neutralizing the source of the potential threat. That such behavior proves White guilt is lost on Whites.)

Needless to say, all this is ably-supported by the usual Christian backing for genocide that made Christianity the global political force it is today; enabling the White Christians (people who do not believe in god so much as believe they are god) to patronize the Indians foolish enough to believe in a White Jesus who hates Red culture: Collaborators in claiming POC are paranoid schizophrenic savages. Whites definition of civilization is to call others savage and then murder, sexually assault and use them in medical experiments.

The film falters in trying to encapsulate all Native-American experience into a simplistic genre format like a horror movie (there is enough material here for half-a-dozen movies) but it proudly wears its ethnic identity on its sleeve to present both a convincing horror movie and a searing indictment of endemic Caucasian injustice; while creating reasonable characterizations.

A perfect dramatic argument against racial integration or assimilation and a savage indictment of the physical abuse, emotional violence and barely-suppressed anger inherent in Christianity as it is actually practiced - as well as of White psychiatry and its desire to pathogise anyone not White. Facing-up-to the ghosts depicted here keeps us grounded and far less prone to the self-delusion and lack of cultural rootedness arising from unresolved issues that is so common among Whites.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER.
Permission granted to reproduce & distribute this posting in any way, shape or form; provided you mention this Blog.
All other rights reserved.

About Us:

My Photo

Frank TALKER - Truth-Teller

News:

Loading...